Bitcoin Hyper’s $16M presale draws whales and retail buyers, but community members are also exploring XRP Tundra’s dual-token presale at $0.01 with staking and audits.Bitcoin Hyper’s $16M presale draws whales and retail buyers, but community members are also exploring XRP Tundra’s dual-token presale at $0.01 with staking and audits.

Bitcoin Hyper Community Discovers XRP Tundra’s Revolutionary Dual-Token Presale Model

2025/09/20 00:13
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER) has quickly become one of 2025’s largest presale stories, raising more than $16.4 million to date. The project is structured around a 21 billion token supply, divided into allocations of 30% for development, 25% for treasury, 20% for marketing, 15% for staking pools, and 10% for liquidity and listings.

Its presale model is designed around rising prices. The cost of HYPER increases either every 48 hours or each time another $100,000 milestone is reached. At the current stage, tokens are being sold for about $0.0129 per HYPER. Daily volumes have averaged more than $100,000 per day, with whale contributions as large as $69,800 reported.

Staking is already part of the presale design. Holders who lock HYPER tokens can access yields between 70% and 78% APY, adding to the momentum that has driven its rapid fundraising.

Why Some Holders Are Turning to XRP Tundra

Despite Bitcoin Hyper’s strong start, members of its community are also looking at XRP Tundra. The draw lies in its fixed presale price of $0.01 per TUNDRA-S, which avoids the escalating costs of staged models. Each purchase comes with a 19% bonus in TUNDRA-S and an equal allocation of TUNDRA-X, the governance and reserve token issued on the XRP Ledger.

Launch values are already set: $2.50 for TUNDRA-S and $1.25 for TUNDRA-X. With 40% of TUNDRA-S supply allocated to presale buyers, early entrants gain a significant share of the ecosystem before listings. For those in Bitcoin Hyper accustomed to constant presale price increases, the defined entry point of XRP Tundra offers a different approach.

Staking Models Compared

Both projects utilize staking, but their designs target different audiences. Bitcoin Hyper offers high-yield pools directly during presale, with rates as high as 78% APY. This has been central to its fundraising campaign and has helped it attract large-scale investors.

XRP Tundra introduces a staking framework tailored to XRP holders. Through Cryo Vaults, participants will lock tokens for one week to 90 days. Longer commitments will generate higher returns, with maximum rewards reaching 30% APY. Frost Keys, NFT-based modifiers, allow users to raise yields or shorten lock times.

While staking is not live yet, presale buyers are guaranteed access once the system launches. That assurance has resonated in community channels: the recent Crypto Legends video covered the advantages of securing staking entry through presale participation.

Security and Verification

A key difference between the two presales lies in transparency. Bitcoin Hyper has drawn attention through fundraising speed and community energy, but it has not published third-party audit results at this stage.

XRP Tundra has already undergone multiple independent reviews. Its contracts and tokenomics have been assessed by Cyberscope, Solidproof, and Freshcoins. The team has also completed KYC verification with Vital Block, confirming developer identities and reducing investor risk.

These measures are critical in a presale market where anonymous teams and unchecked contracts often undermine long-term viability. For Bitcoin Hyper holders assessing diversification, XRP Tundra’s audits and KYC provide a clearer standard of accountability.

A Cross-Community Opportunity

The rise of Bitcoin Hyper shows how strong presale demand remains, especially when high APYs and staged growth are offered. Yet the growing attention on XRP Tundra signals investor appetite for models with fixed pricing, dual-token mechanics, and external verification.

With Bitcoin Hyper selling at $0.0129 after staged increases, and XRP Tundra available at $0.01 with a $2.50/$1.25 launch target, the comparison has become a focal point among presale investors. For members of the Bitcoin Hyper community, XRP Tundra provides an alternative that combines upside potential with governance and staking features backed by third-party audits.

Secure your spot in the XRP Tundra presale and follow official updates:

Website: https://www.xrptundra.com/Medium: https://medium.com/@xrptundraTelegram: https://t.me/xrptundraX: https://x.com/XrptundraContact: Tim Fénix, contact@xrptundra.com

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

Market Opportunity
Hyperlane Logo
Hyperlane Price(HYPER)
$0.08905
$0.08905$0.08905
-5.16%
USD
Hyperlane (HYPER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’

Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’

The post Ripple’s Hidden Road acquisition could ‘supercharge XRP’s utility’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Monday, March 2, 2026, the Depository Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/03 18:12
S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise

S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise

The post S&P 500 Slides as Gas Prices Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. stocks opened sharply lower Tuesday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average and
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/03 18:35
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28