TLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulatedTLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated

JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply

TLDR:

  • Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply
  • Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated primarily through Gate exchange platform
  • Token crashed 85% from $0.35 peak to current $0.07 level showing extreme volatility and risk factors
  • MACD shows bullish momentum building while DMI indicates weakening trend and market indecision ahead

JELLYJELLY has staged a remarkable recovery, climbing nearly three times from its bottom following an almost 90% decline from all-time highs. 

On-chain analysis reveals a concentrated supply structure where three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of total token circulation. 

This pattern mirrors previous observations in PIPPIN, suggesting insider coordination rather than organic market activity.

Coordinated Wallet Clusters Dominate Token Distribution

The largest cluster comprises top externally owned accounts that accumulated primarily through Gate exchange. 

These wallets collectively hold 326,226,487.04 JELLYJELLY tokens worth roughly $42.41 million. This group forms what analysts describe as the core supply backbone of the token’s market structure.

A second cluster consists of medium-sized accounts accumulating tokens from Bitget exchange. 

Together, these wallets control 141,078,919.70 JELLYJELLY valued at approximately $18.34 million. The coordinated accumulation pattern across different exchanges suggests planned activity rather than random retail participation.

The third cluster includes numerous smaller wallets sourcing tokens from Raydium decentralized exchange. 

Despite their size, these wallets display synchronized behavior that distinguishes them from typical retail traders. Combined, the three clusters hold 470,348,304.20 JELLYJELLY worth about $61.15 million.

Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Amid Extreme Volatility

Current trading data shows JELLYJELLY at $0.07022, representing a 36.10% decline from recent peaks. 

The token experienced a dramatic surge to approximately $0.35 in late October before crashing precipitously. Price action has since formed a consolidation base between $0.07 and $0.10.

The MACD indicator displays emerging bullish momentum as the blue line crosses above the signal line with green histogram bars appearing. 

Source: TradingView

This development suggests renewed buying interest despite the significant drawdown from peak levels. However, the Directional Movement Index shows ADX declining, indicating weakening overall trend strength.

Evening Trader Group’s analysis emphasizes that price movement depends primarily on whether controlling clusters choose to distribute their holdings. 

The DMI shows convergence between positive and negative directional indicators around the 30-50 range, reflecting market indecision. The 85% correction from peak levels underscores the extreme volatility characteristic of this asset class.

Market observers note the supply concentration creates conditions where price action depends more on insider decisions than on broader market fundamentals or narrative strength.

The post JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
jellyjelly Logo
jellyjelly Price(JELLYJELLY)
$0.077183
$0.077183$0.077183
+1.38%
USD
jellyjelly (JELLYJELLY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Santander’s Openbank Sparks Crypto Frenzy in Germany

Santander’s Openbank Sparks Crypto Frenzy in Germany

 In Germany, the digital bank Santander Openbank introduces trading in crypto, which offers BTC, ETH, LTC, POL, and ADA in the MiCA framework of the EU. Santander, the largest bank in Spain, has officially introduced cryptocurrency trading to its clients in Germany, using its digital division, Openbank.  With this new service, users can purchase, sell, […] The post Santander’s Openbank Sparks Crypto Frenzy in Germany appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/18 04:30
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

TLDR Evernorth invested $947M in XRP, now valued at $724M, a loss of over $220M. XRP’s price dropped 16% in the last 30 days, leading to Evernorth’s paper losses
Share
Coincentral2025/12/26 03:56