President Donald Trump meddled in the free market during his first term and created a “dumb industrial policy” that he is only now starting to fix, according toPresident Donald Trump meddled in the free market during his first term and created a “dumb industrial policy” that he is only now starting to fix, according to

WSJ chastises the Trump admin for 'dumb industrial policy'

2026/03/31 07:41
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump meddled in the free market during his first term and created a “dumb industrial policy” that he is only now starting to fix, according to a prominent conservative newspaper.

In a Monday evening editorial, The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board claimed telecom mogul Charlie Ergen had been rescued by a regulatory system he once tried to “jury rig.” In 2019 Trump forced T-Mobile and Sprint to sell spectrum and wireless assets to Ergen's Dish network as a condition of permitting their merger. While the purpose of this policy was to create additional competition in the 5G market place, Ergen never built a 5G network, and under President Joe Biden the FCC extended deadlines even as Ergen donated $100,000 to a Biden Super PAC.

Yet because President Trump pressured FCC Chair Brendan Carr to allow Ergen to sell some of his unprofitable licenses rather than have them reclaimed by the FCC, Ergen has been able to strike deals that may ultimately create that fourth wireless competitor which regulators were unable to artificially engineer.

"This is a tale of dumb industrial policy that might end well despite government planners,” the Board opined, slamming Trump’s original meddling in the process. "The original sin was the first Trump DOJ’s attempt to jury-rig a fourth competitor. One political intervention invariably begets more."

On another occasion, the Board pointedly concluded that "that's what happens when politicians and regulators try to manage markets."

The Wall Street Journal, though generally supportive of Trump, has recently pointed criticisms his way on a variety of issues. Earlier in March, it urged Trump to abandon the SAVE America Act, which Trump is pushing in the hope of retaining control of Congress during the 2026 midterm elections.

“The decentralized nature of American elections is a source of resilience, and Republicans rightly opposed President Biden’s attempt to federalize voting rules on the lax California model,” wrote the Journal. “Have they given up federalist principle? If 51 Senate votes are all it takes to limit mail ballots across the country and require voter ID, Democrats next time will use 51 votes to mandate ballot harvesting and ban voter ID.”

The Journal also disputed Trump’s claim that “voter fraud is endemic.”

“Audits in a variety of places—Georgia, Michigan, Texas, Utah, Idaho—have found noncitizen voting and registration to be rare,” the Journal said. “Other states might be worse, but consider incentives: Illegal immigrants who want to stay are trying to avoid being noticed by the authorities. Green card holders have much to lose if they commit a crime. Prosecuting violators is good for deterrence, and vigilance is important.”

Also in March the Journal argued that Trump’s tariffs have been a lag on the US economy.

“Oh, and if Mr. Trump wants a tax-cut boost for the economy while the war continues, he could call off his new 15% universal tariff,” the Journal pointed out. “Consider it our contribution to easing everyone’s economic anxiety.”

Finally, in March the Journal ran an editorial by columnist William A. Galston argued that the Iran war has “backfired” against the president.

“When the current war began, public support was lower than for any other major conflict undertaken in nearly a century,” Galston wrote. “Before attacking Iran, however, Mr. Trump offered only a cursory rationale to Congress and the American people. The need for surprise might conceivably have justified his near-silence on such a grave matter.”

He added, “But there is no justification for his failure to offer a systematic and sustained case for the war once it began,” concluding that a war with a roughly 39 percent approval rating has “backfired” on the president who waged it.

“The American people don’t think that the president has clearly explained the goals of the war, and the share who think he has done so is smaller today than it was at the beginning,” Galston argued. “Americans have concluded that the war will weaken the economy and leave the country less safe. They believe that it is a war of choice, not necessity, and that it is going badly. And despite the administration’s call for short-term sacrifice, people reject paying more for gasoline as their patriotic duty by a margin of 2 to 1.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$2.991
$2.991$2.991
+0.36%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SEC decisions scrutinized as senator seeks records on crypto enforcement rollbacks

SEC decisions scrutinized as senator seeks records on crypto enforcement rollbacks

The post SEC decisions scrutinized as senator seeks records on crypto enforcement rollbacks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. securities regulators have
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 08:08
Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now

Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now

The post Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Supercycle in 2025? DeepSeek Ranks the Best Altcoins to Buy Right Now Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. As a crypto writer, Krishi splits his time between decoding the chaos of the markets and writing about it in a way that doesn’t put you to sleep. He’s been at it for nearly two years in the crypto trenches. Yes, he regrets missing the magnificent rallies that came before that (who doesn’t!), but he’s more than ready to put his money where his words are. Before diving headfirst into crypto, Krishi spent over five years writing for some of the biggest names in tech, including TechRadar, Tom’s Guide, and PC Gaming, covering everything from gadgets and cybersecurity to gaming and software. When he’s not scouring and writing about the latest happenings in crypto, Krishi trades the forex market while keeping crypto in his long-term HODL plans. He’s a Bitcoin believer, though he never lets that bias creep into his writing. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/crypto-supercycle-2025-best-altcoins-to-buy-now-deepseek/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:45
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26