The post Retracement setup or reversal signal? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Phillips 66 (PSX) is a leading downstream energy company specializing in refiningThe post Retracement setup or reversal signal? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Phillips 66 (PSX) is a leading downstream energy company specializing in refining

Retracement setup or reversal signal?

Phillips 66 (PSX) is a leading downstream energy company specializing in refining, midstream, chemicals, and marketing operations. The company share price just handed technical traders a textbook lesson in trendline dynamics. After riding a beautifully constructed ascending support line from June through early December, the stock has done something that immediately catches an experienced analyst’s attention—it broke down.

Let’s unpack what’s happening here, because this isn’t just noise on a chart.

Since mid-year, PSX carved out a steady uptrend, with that yellow support trendline acting like a dependable floor beneath price action. Multiple times throughout the summer and fall, when selling pressure emerged, buyers stepped in right at that line. It worked flawlessly—until it didn’t. In late December, PSX sliced through that support like it suddenly ceased to matter, and that’s where things get interesting for traders on both sides of the market.

The stock currently trades around $129.99, clearly below what was once reliable support. But here’s what separates novice chart-watchers from seasoned technicians: that broken trendline doesn’t just disappear. It transforms. What formerly acted as a springboard for buyers could now function as a ceiling for any rally attempts. In technical analysis, we call this phenomenon a polarity shift.

This is where the “Retrace / Short Level” annotation becomes relevant. If PSX attempts to rally back toward the $134-136 zone—right around that former trendline—we’re likely watching a retracement into fresh resistance. For bearish traders, that area represents a high-probability zone to establish short positions, betting that the breakdown will hold and price continues lower. The logic is simple: previous support often becomes new resistance.

The bullish counter-argument is simply that sometimes breakdowns fail. If PSX can reclaim and close above $136 with conviction, it would suggest the trendline violation was a false breakdown—what we call a bear trap. That scenario would likely trigger short-covering and renewed buying interest, potentially sending the stock back toward recent highs near $145.

So what’s the play here? For bears, patience pays. Wait for that bounce toward $134-136 before initiating shorts, with stops above $137 to limit risk if you’re wrong. For bulls, you need proof of concept: a decisive reclaim of the broken trendline with volume confirmation before considering long entries.

What would invalidate this breakdown scenario? A quick, powerful move back above $136 that holds for multiple sessions. Until that happens, the technical bias tilts bearish, with the broken trendline now acting as overhead resistance rather than underlying support. The energy sector has been volatile lately, and PSX’s chart reflects that uncertainty perfectly—making this a setup worth monitoring closely regardless of your directional bias.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/phillips-66-psx-breaks-critical-uptrend-retracement-setup-or-reversal-signal-202512232103

Market Opportunity
Line Protocol Logo
Line Protocol Price(LINE)
$0.000026
$0.000026$0.000026
+136.36%
USD
Line Protocol (LINE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58