We don’t lack ideas or tools to clean up; we lack a monetary logic that funds non-ROI necessities at planetary scale. If we keep asking capital markets to solve problems that don’t return capital, we will keep getting underinvestment. The path forward is to redefine what we’re willing—and able—to finance, with mechanisms built for public goods rather than profits alone.We don’t lack ideas or tools to clean up; we lack a monetary logic that funds non-ROI necessities at planetary scale. If we keep asking capital markets to solve problems that don’t return capital, we will keep getting underinvestment. The path forward is to redefine what we’re willing—and able—to finance, with mechanisms built for public goods rather than profits alone.

ROI Can’t Save Us: Why Today’s Money Fails at Humanity’s Biggest Problems

5 min read

Modern economy funds what returns capital. That’s efficient for many things—until the necessary work is unprofitable. Cleaning our air, water, and soil is a prime example: pollution has been a by-product of profitable activity; cleaning it is usually a cost center. We now face a paradox: problems we must solve to survive don’t generate the “value” our system recognizes.

What “Cleaning the Planet” Really Means

  • Earth cleaning is the reverse of polluting: removing particles and trash accumulated over decades in air, waters, and soil, and it should be, in all logic, the #1 industry in the future
  • It’s not optional. If regulators are struggling to reduce emissions fast enough, we must also accelerate cleaning to offset damage already done.
  • It’s expensive, slow to monetize, and hard to collateralize. That’s why it struggles to attract capital at the scale and speed required.

What We’ve Tried (and Why It’s Not Enough)

  • Carbon taxes and credits can help, but global alignment is unlikely in time, and taxes don’t automatically turn problems into solutions.
  • Philanthropy and mindful companies do important work, but their budgets and mandates are limited.
  • “Make cleaning profitable” is more slogan than plan. Some business models exist (e.g., CO2 capture with resale, ocean plastics upcycling), but many cleaning tasks have no market buyer.

The ROI(Return On Investment) Constraint

Capital markets optimize for return. Governments also rely on tax revenues and debt markets—both ultimately sensitive to growth forecasts and interest costs. When a vital activity has a weak or negative ROI, it loses in budget prioritization against activities that promise growth. That logic is coherent internally—but existentially misaligned with planetary needs.

Examples of Non-ROI Vital Work

- Industrial-scale particulate removal from air over megacities.

- River, ocean, and microplastic cleanup at the source and at scale.

- Soil remediation for heavy metals and chemical runoff.

- Global reforestation where land-use economics are unfavorable.

- Reshoring/nearshoring essential industries to reduce freight emissions where no clean immediate substitute exists for heavy transportation.

Why the Current Monetary System Struggles

- It rations funding through profitability filters and risk premiums.

- It treats many forms of cleaning as “costs,” not “assets” that generate cashflows.

- It requires political coordination for public-good spending that is slow and polarizing across borders.

- Currency competitiveness—each jurisdiction having its own cost of capital and trade—discourages unilateral spending on non-ROI global goods.

What a Fix Would Require (Design Principles)

- Abundant, stable funding for activities with low or negative ROI but high social impact.

- Programmatic transparency so the public and regulators can verify how funds are used and what impact they produce.

- Global interoperability so cleaning projects can be financed where they are most effective, not just where capital is cheapest.

- Governance that can prioritize public goods without hinging on short-term profit cycles.

A Proposal to Consider: Financing Non-ROI Essentials with Programmable Money

The O project proposes a monetary instrument designed to fill this gap.

Conceptually:

  • Unlimited yet stable medium: elastic issuance to match need, with stability rules independent of human confidence cycles. Funding subject to performance and deliveries.
  • No creditor overhang: fund public-good tasks without debt-service constraints that crowd out operations.
  • Programmatic guardrails: real-time attestations, proof-of-liabilities, open dashboards, and policy hooks for regulators.
  • Target use case: finance earth cleaning—air, water, and soil—at scales capital markets won’t touch due to weak ROI, plus strategic relocation of industries closer to customers to cut freight emissions.

Why are we touting unlimited supply and stability together?

Unlimited without stability is inflationary chaos. Stability without elasticity starves essential work. The premise is to maintain price stability through transparent, rule-based mechanisms while allowing supply to expand specifically into audited, non-ROI vital activities. Think stable purchasing power plus issuance tied to verifiable public-good outputs (e.g., tons of CO2 captured, hectares of soil remediated, kilometers of river cleaned).

Safeguards You’d Expect

- Transparent governance with multi-party controls.

- Redundant oracles and continuous audits.

- Public impact metrics per funded project and performance monitoring.

- Clear on/off policy levers so supervisors can intervene if metrics drift or abuse occurs.

What This Enables

- Large-scale cleaning programs that don’t rely on fragile business models.

- Faster deployment where the marginal benefit is highest, irrespective of local tax capacity.

- A way to fund shared survival tasks even when traditional ROI is absent.

What to Do Today

- Support and scale existing cleaning tech: CO2 capture, ocean cleanup, soil remediation.

- Back nonprofits already doing the hard work on rivers, oceans, air, and soil.

- Encourage industry relocation closer to customers where feasible to reduce high-emission freight.

- Push for radical transparency: real-time reporting on environmental spending and outcomes. Public Transparency.

- Support our non-profit, O International, for the creation of a stable digital currency ecosystem based on global water prices. https://o.international

We don’t lack ideas or tools to clean up; we lack a monetary logic that funds non-ROI necessities at a planetary scale. If we keep asking capital markets to solve problems that don’t return capital, we will keep getting underinvestment. The path forward is to redefine what we’re willing—and able—to finance, with mechanisms built for public goods rather than profits alone.

:::warning Note: This is a design space; O coin is one proposed approach—not investment advice.

:::

:::tip Learn more on how a stable coin based on global water price can resolve all those issues very quickly at https://o.international

:::

\n

\n

\n

\n

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.007653
$0.007653$0.007653
-0.72%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
Trump swears he'll donate winnings in $10 billion lawsuit against his own IRS

Trump swears he'll donate winnings in $10 billion lawsuit against his own IRS

President Donald Trump told NBC News' Tom Llamas in an interview released on Wednesday that he has no interest in actually keeping any money he wins from his lawsuit
Share
Rawstory2026/02/05 10:43
US President Donald Trump says Warsh would’ve lost Fed if he pledged rate hike

US President Donald Trump says Warsh would’ve lost Fed if he pledged rate hike

The post US President Donald Trump says Warsh would’ve lost Fed if he pledged rate hike appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US President Donald Trump said that
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/05 10:23