TLDR:  Early positioning before the FOMC left little upside, prompting profit-taking once the expected rate cut was confirmed. Powell’s cautious tone on inflationTLDR:  Early positioning before the FOMC left little upside, prompting profit-taking once the expected rate cut was confirmed. Powell’s cautious tone on inflation

Why Markets Dumped Despite a Bullish FOMC: The Real Forces Behind the Sell-Off

2025/12/12 04:24

TLDR: 

  • Early positioning before the FOMC left little upside, prompting profit-taking once the expected rate cut was confirmed.
  • Powell’s cautious tone on inflation and labor conditions reduced confidence in a faster path toward easier policy.
  • Oracle’s weak earnings and rising CAPEX fueled concerns about tech demand, spreading fear across risk markets.
  • The sell-off reflected elevated expectations rather than a change in macro direction, keeping long-term liquidity intact.

Bitcoin market dump activity intensified shortly after the Federal Reserve delivered a rate cut widely viewed as supportive for risk assets. 

The move surprised many traders who expected crypto to extend its pre-meeting strength. Instead, Bitcoin erased the full pre-FOMC advance within twelve hours as markets reassessed the environment.

The decline represented a shift from elevated expectations to renewed caution.

Although the policy action aligned with forecasts, the broader reaction showed that traders had positioned early and left little room for additional upside once the announcement became official.

Early Positioning and Renewed Uncertainty

A detailed post from Bull Theory explained that rate cut odds sat near 95 percent before the meeting. 

Several large traders increased exposure last week, anticipating liquidity support and driving the early pump. When the decision confirmed the cut and introduced $40 billion in T-bill purchases, those early movers began reducing positions, starting the initial wave of selling.

Powell’s press conference introduced another layer of caution. He noted that inflation remained above target and described a softer labor market. 

The Fed’s projections also showed only one cut expected in 2026. This combination reduced confidence among traders who hoped for a stronger signal toward easier conditions.

Once U.S. markets closed, the downturn intensified. Overnight trading saw additional pressure as uncertainty replaced the earlier optimism. 

Bitcoin followed the risk-off tone, pulling back sharply as liquidity trades unwound.

Bull Theory added that softer labor data may still give the Fed flexibility to ease later. However, the immediate reaction centered on the absence of a firm timeline and the need for traders to reassess positioning after the event.

Corporate Earnings and Broader Risk Aversion

The sell-off widened after Oracle released its quarterly results. The company missed adjusted revenue projections and lifted capital expenditure plans, sending the stock down sharply in after-hours trading.

 The decline pushed U.S. futures lower and added pressure to an already unstable market environment.

Traders viewed the earnings miss as a sign of potential cooling demand across the technology sector. This concern spread quickly, creating a shift away from high-beta assets. 

Crypto markets absorbed the fallout as the sentiment change moved from equities into digital assets.

The reaction aligned with an environment where expectations ran ahead of reality. Several traders had already priced in aggressive liquidity conditions, making the market vulnerable to any negative catalyst. As a result, both equities and crypto moved lower in a synchronized manner.

Bull Theory noted that the broader macro backdrop still supports liquidity over the coming year. The Fed has delivered three consecutive cuts, T-bill purchases remain elevated, and Powell signaled no expectation of a rate hike. 

The sell-off reflected expectation mismatch rather than a change in economic direction.

The post Why Markets Dumped Despite a Bullish FOMC: The Real Forces Behind the Sell-Off appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
-11.46%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Share
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01
XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

The post XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. StraitsX Stablecoins Unleash Power: XSGD And XUSD Launch
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:59