CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSSION. Senate finance committee chairman Sherwin Gatchalian speaks to budget watchdogs regarding the national budget process in a hearing on CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSSION. Senate finance committee chairman Sherwin Gatchalian speaks to budget watchdogs regarding the national budget process in a hearing on

Bicam reconciles education, health, agri 2026 budgets on first day

2025/12/14 09:44

MANILA, Philippines – The proposed 2026 budgets of the education, health, and agriculture sectors took centerstage during the first day of the bicameral conference committee (bicam) meetings on Saturday, December 13.

It is during these bicam meetings that the House of Representatives and the Senate reconcile their versions of the proposed budget.

This was also the first time in history that the bicam deliberations were livestreamed following public scrutiny due to the flood control corruption scandal linked to budget insertions.

Farm-to-market roads

Bicam discussions were at a deadlock for nearly an hour on Saturday night as House lawmakers and senators butt heads over proposed funding for farm-to-market roads.

Under the Senate’s version of the spending plan, the Department of Agriculture (DA) would receive P16 billion in funding to construct farm-to-market roads. However, the House contingent appealed to nearly double the funding to P33 billion to cover projects in far-flung areas of the country.

Senators, however, questioned whether the DA was ready to take on the additional funding as it takes over construction of the roads from the Department of Public Works and Highways.

Senator Imee Marcos flagged that the DA had only 65 people nationwide for the task, while Senators Pia Cayetano and Erwin Tulfo raised concerns that farm-to-market roads would become the next target for infrastructure corruption.

Kung iisipin, wala nga ‘yung flood control, dito naman sa farm-to-market. Ito naman ang iisipin mo na dito magkaroon ng problema. I mean, lumipat lang from flood control dito naman sa farm-to-market. Magiging source of corruption,” Tulfo said.

(If you think about it, there are no flood control projects but there are farm-to-market roads. You will suspect it will cause problems. I mean, it may have just moved from flood control to farm-to-market. It will be a source of corruption.)

While the bicam eventually agreed to nearly double funding for farm-to-market roads at P33 billion, Cayetano, Legarda, and Tulfo voiced their reservations surrounding the move.

Play Video Bicam reconciles education, health, agri 2026 budgets on first day

“I want to see countryside development. Rest assured, that is what’s in my heart. But I cannot stand to see corruption continue to happen,” Cayetano said. 

‘Soft pork’ in health?

House and Senate lawmakers agreed to increase funding for the Department of Health’s (DOH) MAIFIP program (Medical Assistance for Indigent and Financially Incapacitated Patients) to P51 billion from P49 billion.

The program offers financial assistance to cover the medical costs for indigent patients. It is also among the four social aid programs criticized by budget watchdogs as a form of pork.

Must Read

Watchdogs call to operationalize ayuda programs, open budget and infra data

Senators raised concerns that the program would perpetuate political patronage since recipients often relied on guarantee letters from politicians to receive funds. But the House contingent argued that reducing funding for MAIFIP would affect some 1.1 million patients since the universal healthcare law has yet to be fully implemented.

“Until such time that the UHC law is really completely properly implemented and PhilHealth is able to handle all of this, I believe that we must provide for the poorest of the poor,” said Senator Loren Legarda.

Lawmakers from both chambers of Congress also agreed to tighten the wording of a general provision that prohibits elected officials from participating in ayuda (social aid) distribution since the current language only covers cash transfers.

From PhilHealth to foreign-assisted projects

Senator Imee Marcos also questioned how the Department of Finance used the P60 billion in “excess” Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) funds that were transferred to the national treasury in 2024.

Bataan 2nd District Representative Abet Garcia explained that the funding went to the following programs:

  • Health emergency allowance for frontline health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic – P27.45 billion
  • Foreign-assisted projects – P13 billion
  • MAIFIP – P10 billion
  • Procurement of various medical equipment for DOH hospitals – P4.1 billion
  • Funding for three DOH health facilities – P3.37 billion
  • Health Facilities Enhancement Program – P1.69 billion

Marcos’ remarks come after the Supreme Court ordered the return of P60 billion, which will be done through an appropriation in the 2026 spending plan.

Garcia also said they would require PhilHealth to submit a detailed breakdown and clarify how future appropriations would comply with the high court’s ruling.

Education gets lion’s share

The bicam approved a whopping P1.38 trillion in funding for agencies in the education sector, which includes the Department of Education (DepEd), state universities and colleges (SUCs), and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED).

DepEd’s Office of the Secretary will receive P961 billion in funding, SUCs will get P138 billion, while CHED will receive P47 billion.

Lawmakers from both the House and Senate also agreed to transfer P2 billion of funding for the Tulong Dunong student assistance program to CHED from the SUCs. They believed the move would streamline implementation and allow more students to access assistance.

Under the Tulong Dunong program, eligible students with a combined gross income of less than P400,000 can receive P15,000 in assistance per academic year. 

The Bicam meeting will resume on Sunday, December 14, at 2 pm. – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.