The Public Works department asked lawmakers on Sunday to restore about P45 billion cut from its 2026 budget, warning that the shortfall could slow construction The Public Works department asked lawmakers on Sunday to restore about P45 billion cut from its 2026 budget, warning that the shortfall could slow construction

DPWH wants P45-B back to keep projects moving

The Public Works department asked lawmakers on Sunday to restore about P45 billion cut from its 2026 budget, warning that the shortfall could slow construction activity and weigh further on an already cooling Philippine economy.

Public Works Secretary Vivencio B. Dizon was allowed to join a select group of senators and congressmen finalizing the proposed P6.793-trillion national budget — a rare move that underscored growing concerns that deep cuts to infrastructure funds could stall projects that have long propped up economic growth.

“We all know that in the past quarter, the economy only grew by 4%,” Mr. Dizon told members of the bicameral conference committee. “This is largely because of the cut in public expenditure, especially in infrastructure.”

He said President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. had ordered him both to crack down on overpriced construction materials and ensure infrastructure spending accelerates given its central role in job creation and economic activity.

Mr. Dizon’s appeal comes as the agency enforces stricter procurement rules to prevent inflated costing of materials — an issue at the center of a widening corruption scandal tied to anomalous flood-control contracts.

The controversy has implicated several politicians, officials and contractors in a multibillion-peso kickback scheme that has dented confidence in the administration and contributed to a pullback in public works spending since July.

Congress has since pared down the Department of Public Works and Highways’ (DPWH) budget by hundreds of billions. The Senate’s version of the 2026 budget sets aside P570.8 billion for the agency, about 8.6% less than the P624.48 billion approved by the House of Representatives in October.

Earlier, congressmen cut P255 billion in flood-control allocations from the Executive’s proposed P880-billion infrastructure program, citing the investigations.

Mr. Dizon said the P45-billion restoration he is seeking would not revive any flood-control projects flagged in the kickback scheme. The money, he added, would instead support road, bridge and other infrastructure works risked by the Senate’s cuts.

“We request that we go back to the levels of the House General Appropriations bill, and let the DPWH implement the price adjustment to make sure that the deductions are correct and based per project,” he said. “It’s to make sure that the… integrity of the project is not compromised, and to make sure that they will still be implemented.”

The agency issued a department-wide order tightening procurement to prevent overpricing, Mr. Dizon said. Savings from lower materials costs, he added, would either be remitted to government coffers or redirected to other state programs at the President’s discretion. “Upon the President’s approval, it may be used to augment projects,” he said.

He also warned that several projects planned for 2026 would likely be delayed because the agency could not finalize allocations while potential adjustments to material pricing are still under review.

“Because early procurement was delayed, there are many projects for 2026 that will be delayed,” Mr. Dizon said. “We are not sure what projects will be passed by Congress.”

Scrutiny of next year’s national budget has intensified amid the scale of the alleged corruption in flood-control spending, fueling public protests and prompting lawmakers to adopt added transparency measures. These include livestreaming bicameral hearings that were traditionally held behind closed doors.

The bicameral conference committee must reconcile the Senate and House versions of the spending plan before transmitting the final budget to Malacañang for Mr. Marcos’ signature. Lawmakers will adjourn on Dec. 23 — later than originally planned — to ensure ratification of the appropriations bill.

Officials have until year-end to avoid a reenacted 2025 budget, which economists warn would further drag growth. — Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio

Market Opportunity
B Logo
B Price(B)
$0.22989
$0.22989$0.22989
-0.29%
USD
B (B) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/17 17:00
X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X says its Terms of Service will change Jan. 15, 2026, expanding how the platform defines user “Content” and adding contract language tied to the operation and
Share
CryptoSlate2025/12/17 19:24
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12