The post Hyperliquid proposes permanent burn of Assistance Fund HYPE appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Hyper Foundation has proposed treating all HYPE heldThe post Hyperliquid proposes permanent burn of Assistance Fund HYPE appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Hyper Foundation has proposed treating all HYPE held

Hyperliquid proposes permanent burn of Assistance Fund HYPE

The Hyper Foundation has proposed treating all HYPE held in its Hyperliquid Assistance Fund as permanently burned, removing the tokens from supply via validator vote.

Summary

  • Hyper Foundation proposed a validator vote to treat all HYPE in the Assistance Fund as permanently burned.
  • The tokens are already locked in a system address with no private key, requiring no onchain action.
  • The vote runs through Dec. 24 and could remove over 10% of HYPE from circulating and total supply.

A governance proposal released by the Hyper Foundation would exclude all HYPE held in the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund from circulating supply, pending validator approval.

The proposal was published on Dec. 17 through the Hyper Foundation’s official channels and governance forum.

Assistance Fund tokens treated as burned

Under the proposal, validators are asked to recognize the Hyperliquid (HYPE) tokens accumulated in the Assistance Fund as permanently burned, despite no onchain transaction taking place. The tokens already sit in a system address that has never been controlled by a private key, making them inaccessible without a protocol-level intervention.

The Assistance Fund converts the protocol’s trading fees to HYPE through an automated process embedded in Hyperliquid’s L1 execution layer. Those tokens accumulate in a public address address, which has no private key and functions similarly to a burn address in practice.

A “Yes” vote would establish a binding social consensus that the protocol will never authorize an upgrade to access those funds. The Foundation said no technical changes are required, as the tokens are already mathematically irretrievable.

Community estimates place the Assistance Fund’s balance at roughly 37 million HYPE, representing more than 10% of circulating supply. If formally removed, the tokens would also be excluded from total supply calculations.

Validator vote and timing

The decision will be made through a stake-weighted validator process. Validators are required to signal their intent on the governance forum by Dec. 21 at 04:00 UTC. Token holders can then delegate stake to validators aligned with their position through Dec. 24 at 04:00 UTC, when the final outcome will be determined.

If approved, the change would lock in a more restrictive supply model by preventing any future use of the Assistance Fund balance for grants, development, or emergency measures. The Foundation said the vote would determine whether the Assistance Fund balance is permanently excluded from supply calculations.

The vote follows earlier community discussions around supply reductions in 2025, including a September proposal that explored a 45% cut to total supply but did not advance.

In 2025, Hyperliquid ranked as the top onchain perpetuals venues by volume and fee revenue. A large share of those fees has continued to flow into the Assistance Fund through the protocol’s automated conversion process. That mechanism has been central to how HYPE supply dynamics have evolved over time.

Source: https://crypto.news/hyper-foundation-hyperliquid-assistance-fund-burn-2025/

Market Opportunity
FUND Logo
FUND Price(FUND)
$0.012
$0.012$0.012
+14.28%
USD
FUND (FUND) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/17 17:00
X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X says its Terms of Service will change Jan. 15, 2026, expanding how the platform defines user “Content” and adding contract language tied to the operation and
Share
CryptoSlate2025/12/17 19:24
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12