X’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courtsX’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courts

X expands ‘Content’ to AI prompts, outputs in 2026 terms update

X’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courts.​

Summary
  • 2026 terms redefine Content to include prompts, outputs and data “obtained or created” through X, licensed worldwide for any use, including AI training, without extra pay.​
  • New misuse clause targets AI “jailbreaking,” prompt injection and circumvention, while liquidated damages stay at $15,000 per 1,000,000 posts scraped in 24 hours.​
  • X keeps Tarrant County, Texas, as the forum, imposes 1–2 year claim windows, class-action waivers and a $100 liability cap, moves critics say chill research and lawsuits.

Social media platform X announced terms of service changes effective Jan. 15, 2026, that expand the company’s definition of user “Content” and add provisions related to artificial intelligence system operations, according to the updated agreement published by the company.

X and the crypto content

The revisions broaden the definition of user Content to explicitly include “inputs, prompts, outputs,” and information “obtained or created through the Services,” according to the draft terms. The current terms, dated Nov. 15, 2024, remain in effect until the 2026 version takes over.

Under the updated agreement, users grant X a worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable license to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display, and distribute Content “for any purpose,” including analyzing it and training machine learning and AI models, according to the terms document. The agreement states that no compensation is paid for those uses and that access to the service constitutes “sufficient compensation.”

The 2024 terms framed user responsibility around “any Content you provide,” without expressly naming prompts and outputs, according to a comparison of the documents.

The 2026 draft adds a prohibited-conduct clause targeting AI circumvention attempts. The terms define “misuse” to include attempts to bypass platform controls through “jailbreaking,” “prompt engineering, or injection,” language that does not appear in the 2024 terms, according to the documents.

The updated agreement includes Europe-specific provisions addressing content enforcement under European Union and United Kingdom law. The terms note that EU and UK law can require enforcement against content described as “harmful” or “unsafe,” with examples including bullying or humiliating content, eating disorder content, and content about methods of self-harm or suicide. The 2026 terms add UK-specific language describing how users can challenge enforcement actions under the UK Online Safety Act 2023.

X maintains restrictions on automated access and data collection, barring crawling or scraping “in any form, for any purpose” without prior written consent. The terms set liquidated damages at $15,000 per 1,000,000 posts requested, viewed, or accessed in any 24-hour period when violations involve that volume, according to the agreement. The 2026 draft adjusts wording to apply when a user induces or knowingly facilitates violations.

Dispute provisions require claims to proceed in federal or state courts in Tarrant County, Texas. The 2026 text states that forum and choice-of-law provisions apply to “pending and future disputes” regardless of when the underlying conduct occurred. The updated terms establish a one-year deadline for federal claims and two years for state claims, replacing the single one-year deadline in the earlier version.

The agreement includes a class-action waiver barring users from bringing claims as a class or in representative proceedings in many cases, and caps X’s liability at $100 per covered dispute, according to the terms.

The Knight First Amendment Institute stated that X’s terms “will stifle independent research” and called the approach “a disturbing move that the company should reverse.” The Center for Countering Digital Hate announced in November 2024 that it would quit X ahead of a terms change and criticized the Texas venue requirement as a tactic to steer disputes toward favorable courts. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how lawsuits can have “a chilling effect” on critics, according to published statements.

The changes take effect Jan. 15, 2026, according to X’s announcement.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03538
$0.03538$0.03538
-2.48%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14
MSCI’s Proposal May Trigger $15B Crypto Outflows

MSCI’s Proposal May Trigger $15B Crypto Outflows

MSCI's plan to exclude crypto-treasury companies could cause $15B outflows, impacting major firms.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/19 13:17
This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

The post This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States Representative Cloe Fields has seen his stake in Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN) stock return over 200% in just a matter of weeks. According to congressional trade filings, the lawmaker purchased a stake in the online real estate company on July 21, 2025, investing between $1,001 and $15,000. At the time, the stock was trading around $2 and had been largely stagnant for months. Receive Signals on US Congress Members’ Stock Trades Stocks Stay up-to-date on the trading activity of US Congress members. The signal triggers based on updates from the House disclosure reports, notifying you of their latest stock transactions. Enable signal The trade has since paid off, with Opendoor surging to $10, a gain of nearly 220% in under two months. By comparison, the broader S&P 500 index rose less than 5% during the same period. OPEN one-week stock price chart. Source: Finbold Assuming he invested a minimum of $1,001, the purchase would now be worth about $3,200, while a $15,000 stake would have grown to nearly $48,000, generating profits of roughly $2,200 and $33,000, respectively. OPEN’s stock rally Notably, Opendoor’s rally has been fueled by major corporate shifts and market speculation. For instance, in August, the company named former Shopify COO Kaz Nejatian as CEO, while co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu rejoined the board, moves seen as a return to the company’s early innovative spirit.  Outgoing CEO Carrie Wheeler’s resignation and sale of millions in stock reinforced the sense of a new chapter. Beyond leadership changes, Opendoor’s surge has taken on meme-stock characteristics. In this case, retail investors piled in as shares climbed, while short sellers scrambled to cover, pushing prices higher.  However, the stock is still not without challenges, where its iBuying model is untested at scale, margins are thin, and debt tied to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:02