Bitcoin active addresses are at year lows, with developers scrambling to quantum-resistant solutions. BIP-360 makes the network future-proof against cryptographicBitcoin active addresses are at year lows, with developers scrambling to quantum-resistant solutions. BIP-360 makes the network future-proof against cryptographic

Bitcoin Activity Drops as Quantum Defense Debate Intensifies

Bitcoin active addresses are at year lows, with developers scrambling to quantum-resistant solutions. BIP-360 makes the network future-proof against cryptographic threats.

The on-chain activity of Bitcoin keeps dropping. Active addresses are now the lowest since December 2024. The network also has fewer transactions when the price fluctuations are volatile.

As CryptoPatel on X notes, Bitcoin wallets involved in transactions have turned to multi-year lows. The crypto analyst pointed out that the price action does not seem to be related to the real usage volume. Reduced activity is a common indicator of slowdown periods in the market.

Source –CryptoPatel 

You might also like: Bitcoin Long-Term Holders Break Pattern: $85K or $91K?

Will Quantum Computers Doom Bitcoin’s Future?

An increasing number of supporters are agitating toward quantum-resistant upgrades. Capriole founder Charles Edwards said that the implementation should be completed and implemented in 2026. The fund manager cautioned that quantum hackers can compromise 20-30% of Bitcoin.

The most successful proposal has become BIP-360. The enhancement would add post-quantum signature choices on vulnerable addresses. It needs more diffuse acceptance among hardware wallet vendors, node operators, and cryptocurrency exchanges.

Source : Edward

Edwards was controversial on X. He proposed to burn all coins that do not switch to BIP-360 by 2028. This caused intense controversy in society.

You might also like: Why Does Bitcoin Always Bleed at 10AM? The Pattern No One’s Explaining

Industry Leaders Dismiss Immediate Quantum Threat

The urgency is not shared by all. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, attacked quantum fear participants on X. He noted that Bitcoin does not make use of encryption. Back also added that the quantum computing threat is decades off.

Early quantum concerns were also mocked by Samson Mow of Jan3. On X, Mow tweeted: “Quantum computing can not even factor 21. He asked panic selling about the remote hypothetical risks.

Analyst Willy Woo of X wrote that the Taproot utilization had decreased to 20 to 42 percent in 2024. Woo asserted that he had never before witnessed the newest format being pushed out. He wrote that Taproot is vulnerable to quantum, and older formats are not.

Tim Ruffing of Blockstream Research had a different opinion. His research paper held that Taproot with script-path spends alone is post-quantum secure. Based on the results, a quantum attacker is unable to peep inside Taproot outputs.

Back suggested replacing ECDSA and Schnorr signatures with hash-based signature schemes, which are quantum-safe. The method would be based on the assumptions of hash functions. The paper was published on December 5 by Blockstream Research.

The network has a complicated transition to come. The participants of the market are arguing about the timeline and urgency. The future safety of Bitcoin is left between safety and exploration.

You might also like: Bitcoin Breaks Free: Wall Street Correlation Hits 2025 Low

The post Bitcoin Activity Drops as Quantum Defense Debate Intensifies appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.003094
$0.003094$0.003094
-0.76%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21