The post Crypto Regulation Back on the Agenda in Polish Parliament appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulations Poland’s parliament has revived a controversialThe post Crypto Regulation Back on the Agenda in Polish Parliament appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulations Poland’s parliament has revived a controversial

Crypto Regulation Back on the Agenda in Polish Parliament

Regulations

Poland’s parliament has revived a controversial crypto bill that could significantly reshape the country’s digital asset landscape, sending it back into the legislative process months after it was blocked by a presidential veto.

The lower house of parliament approved the measure on Thursday, clearing it with a renewed majority despite unchanged wording from the version rejected last year. The bill now moves to the Senate, where it will once again be debated before potentially returning to the president for final approval.

Key takeaways:

  • Poland’s lower house has passed a previously vetoed crypto bill without amendments.
  • The legislation aims to align Poland with the EU’s MiCA framework.
  • The bill now heads to the Senate for review.
  • President Karol Nawrocki may face pressure to approve it despite earlier opposition.

The legislation is designed to bring Poland into alignment with the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, a framework that all member states are expected to implement by mid-2026. However, critics argue that Poland’s approach goes beyond harmonization and risks placing disproportionate constraints on crypto firms and users operating in the country.

Bill Returns Unchanged Despite Earlier Rejection

What has drawn particular attention is that lawmakers reintroduced the proposal exactly as it stood before — without revisions, amendments, or concessions to earlier criticism. One parliamentarian noted that the text returned “unchanged down to the last comma,” despite objections raised during the previous attempt.

The earlier version of the bill had successfully passed both chambers of parliament, only to be vetoed in December by President Karol Nawrocki. At the time, Nawrocki warned that the legislation could undermine civil liberties, property rights, and broader economic stability. His intervention halted the bill just short of becoming law.

Now, government officials suggest the outcome may be different. According to a spokesperson, the president recently received a confidential national security briefing that clarified the bill’s implications, increasing the likelihood that he will sign it if it reaches his desk again.

The renewed push places Nawrocki in a politically delicate position. During his election campaign, he positioned himself as a defender of innovation and voiced opposition to heavy-handed crypto regulation. In public statements, he pledged to protect the digital asset sector from what he described as excessive state control, arguing that innovation should take precedence over restrictive oversight.

Nawrocki won the presidency by a narrow margin and remains eligible for a second term later this decade. How he handles the revived crypto bill could shape both Poland’s regulatory posture toward digital assets and his credibility with voters who supported his pro-innovation stance.

As the Senate reviews the proposal, Poland’s crypto industry and wider tech community will be watching closely. If approved and signed into law, the bill would mark a decisive shift toward stricter oversight — and could test the balance between EU regulatory alignment and national promises of innovation-friendly policy.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new trends in the world of digital currencies. Whether providing in-depth analysis or daily reports on all topics, his deep understanding and enthusiasm for what he does make him a valuable member of the team.

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/crypto-regulation-back-on-the-agenda-in-polish-parliament/

Market Opportunity
Housecoin Logo
Housecoin Price(HOUSE)
$0.002014
$0.002014$0.002014
-0.24%
USD
Housecoin (HOUSE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14