The post SEC Seeks Long Term FTX SEC Executive Bans for Former Trio appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEC filed for 10-year and 8-year corporate leadership bansThe post SEC Seeks Long Term FTX SEC Executive Bans for Former Trio appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEC filed for 10-year and 8-year corporate leadership bans

SEC Seeks Long Term FTX SEC Executive Bans for Former Trio

  • SEC filed for 10-year and 8-year corporate leadership bans against Ellison, Wang, and Singh.
  • The trio is permanently barred from violating federal securities laws under new consent judgments.
  • Regulatory filings finalize the civil enforcement path following the $1.8B FTX investor fraud.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said on Thursday it has filed proposed final consent judgments against three former executives of collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX and its trading affiliate Alameda Research.

The filings, submitted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involve Caroline Ellison, former chief executive of Alameda Research, Zixiao “Gary” Wang, former chief technology officer of FTX, and Nishad Singh, a former co-lead engineer at FTX.

Related: Coinbase Sues Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut Over Prediction Market Oversight Battle

Pending judicial sign-off, the trio will face permanent injunctions against violating federal securities antifraud laws and five-year conduct-based restrictions. Ellison is set to endure a 10-year ban from serving as an officer or director of a public company, while Wang and Singh have agreed to eight-year bans.

This regulatory crackdown follows a period where all three executives cooperated with federal prosecutors, serving as star witnesses in the criminal trial against Sam Bankman-Fried. Bankman-Fried was convicted in late 2023 on seven counts of wire fraud and conspiracy, resulting in a 25-year prison sentence.

The $1.8B Illusion: Regulators Detail Systematic Misuse of Assets

The SEC’s complaints, filed between late 2022 and early 2023, allege that from 2019 to 2022 FTX raised more than $1.8 billion from investors while falsely portraying the platform as having strong safeguards to protect customer assets.

According to regulators, Alameda Research was secretly granted special privileges on the FTX platform, including exemption from key risk controls and access to customer funds through a virtually unlimited credit arrangement. The SEC said Wang and Singh helped design software that enabled customer assets to be transferred to Alameda, while Ellison oversaw Alameda’s trading activities using those funds.

The agency further alleges that hundreds of millions in customer liquidity were repurposed for venture capital bets and personal loans to executives, including Bankman-Fried himself.

No Admission of Wrongdoing

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, Ellison, Wang and Singh agreed to the proposed judgments, which would formally conclude the agency’s civil enforcement actions against them.

The case stands as a landmark for the SEC’s oversight of digital asset markets, highlighting an aggressive posture toward executive accountability in the wake of industry-defining failures. FTX’s bankruptcy in November 2022 remains the largest insolvency in the history of the sector, sparking a global regulatory reset.

Related: Ex-Pump.fun Developer Sentenced to 6 Years for $2 Million Solana Fraud in London Court

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/sec-seeks-long-term-ftx-sec-executive-bans-for-former-trio/

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.005576
$0.005576$0.005576
+5.20%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

The post Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A prominent Zimbabwean eye specialist is demanding
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 20:59
Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

The post Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 21:10