ASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family ratingASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family rating

Asialink gets issuer ratings with ‘stable’ outlook from S&P, Moody’s

ASIALINK Finance Corp. (AFC) has received “BB” long-term and “B” short-term issuer ratings from S&P Global Ratings and a “Ba2” long-term corporate family rating (CFR) from Moody’s Ratings, with both debt watchers citing the company’s market leadership and strong capital position.

This is the first time that the two debt watchers assigned ratings for the nonbank financial institution. They both gave “stable” outlooks for their respective below investment-grade assessments, which means the ratings are unlikely to change in the near term.

“Our ratings on Asialink reflect our view that the company will maintain its leadership in Philippines’ refinancing and second-hand auto loan segments over the next 12-24 months,” S&P Global said in a statement. “The company has strong capitalization, boosted by a significant equity infusion from its financial sponsor — Creador, a private equity fund.”

In 2024, Creador invested P4 billion into Asialink to help fund its expansion plans.

“AFC’s ‘Ba2’ CFR reflects the company’s strong capitalization and profitability, underpinned by its extensive domestic franchise… AFC is one of the largest non-bank financial institutions in the Philippines, which supports micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) by providing loans backed by collateral (vehicles and real estate), by revenue and number of physical branches. Its strong franchise is evidenced by its branch distribution across the country, extensive collection infrastructure and dealer partnerships, providing it with a competitive business advantage,” Moody’s Ratings said in a separate statement.

S&P Global said Asialink has a niche position in the second-hand car and truck financing market, cornering a 10-15% share.

“The market for financing used vehicles is highly fragmented with numerous small players… Asialink has a competitive advantage over its smaller peers due to its significant scale and branch network. These are important because auto financing in provincial areas requires an on-the-ground presence to be near the customer, to facilitate loans disbursement and collection,” it said.

Moody’s Ratings said the company’s strength lies in its capitalization as its tangible common equity to tangible managed assets (TCE/TMA) grew to 27.4% at the end of last year from 17.6% in 2023.

“Its high capital would provide sufficient buffers against the cyclicality of potential loan losses. We expect its TCE/TMA will remain above 21% in the next two years.”

“We forecast the company will have a risk-adjusted capital ratio of about 19% over the next two years, compared with about 20.4% as of Dec. 31, 2024… Asialink’s modest targeted dividend payout ratios of 20%-30% for 2025-2027 will also support its strong capital position,” S&P Global added.

It projects 25%-28% annual loan growth for this year until 2027, slightly slower than the 2021-2024 compounded annual growth rate of 34%.

S&P Global said “very high margins” on Asialink’s core lending book also support its profitability, with its average loan size, mainly for individuals and small and medium enterprises, at about $8,500 and having effective lending rates of 23%-30% per annum.

“The company’s return on average assets (ROAA) of 5.5% for 2024 compares favorably with the Philippines banking sector average of 1.5%, and the 2.5%-3.0% peer average for finance companies in Southeast Asia… We forecast Asialink’s ROAA will recover to about 6.5% in 2027. The projected profit levels are lower than a recent peak of 7.5% in 2022, reflecting the company’s shift toward secured lending, where yields are lower than for unsecured personal loans. Pre-pandemic, Asialink’s loan portfolio had 30% secured loans and 70% unsecured consumer loans. Today, the portfolio is 95% secured.”

Elevated credit costs seen in 2024 may continue to affect Asialink’s 2025 profit but could ease over the next two years, it added.

“Our base case assumes Asialink’s net interest margin (NIM) will improve to 24%-26% over 2025-2027, compared with 23%-24% in 2022-2024. The company’s loans predominantly have a fixed rate, while its funding costs for bank loans correlate with policy rates. Policy rates in the Philippines peaked at 6.5% in 2024, and have since been cut to 4.75%. We forecast the rates will decline to 4% by 2027, which will support NIM improvement,” S&P Global said.

“Given that its lending rates show low sensitivity to the central bank’s interest rate cuts, AFC’s NIM will benefit from lower funding costs over the next 12-18 months,” Moody’s Ratings added.

ASSET QUALITY
Meanwhile, both credit raters noted that the company faces some asset quality risks due to rapid loan growth and its focus on higher-risk borrower segments like individuals and small business owners

“Management’s steps to tighten underwriting standards, and the company’s strong capitalization and good profitability temper these risks,” S&P Global said. “Asialink’s heavy emphasis on loan collection and collateral recovery helps to control credit risks. The company leverages its extensive physical presence and network of collection agents to collect past-due loans and foreclose the underlying collateral.”

“AFC’s asset quality, while modest, benefits from an effective collateral collection process with borrowers and strong recovery rates. While AFC has a high default rate on its portfolio, in the low double-digit range, the loss given default is substantially reduced by collateral sales. We expect AFC’s asset quality to remain largely stable, with risks arising from its high loan growth and high level of defaults, balanced by its strong ability to collect and sell collateral,” Moody’s Ratings said.

Both debt watchers also flagged concentration risks in Asialink’s funding profile.

“Unlike its regional peers, AFC’s funding sources are not as diversified due to limited access to capital markets, and it has funding concentration to a single domestic bank. Regardless, the company has good access to credit lines, including access to long term funding from global development financial institutions (International Finance Corp. and Asian Development Bank), and its maintenance of P1-1.5 billion minimum cash buffer, helps to mitigate its refinancing risks,” Moody’s Ratings said.

“In our opinion, Asialink’s main funding providers are unlikely to cut or reduce credit lines. However, they could be circumspect in increasing their exposure due to single-borrower limits or concentration considerations. Asialink is seeking new funding lines from local banks, foreign banks, and multilateral agencies to diversify funding and ease concentration risks. It has had early success on this front,” S&P Global added.

It said its “stable” rating outlook shows that it expects the company to keep its market leadership and strong capitalization despite intense competition in the used vehicle financing segment.

S&P Global and Moody’s Ratings both said they could upgrade their ratings if Asialink shows improvements in its funding profile and asset quality, while significant deterioration of both could lead to a downgrade.

Moody’s Ratings added that the strength or weakness of the operating environment for Philippine financing companies could also affect its assessment of the company. — K.K. Chan

Market Opportunity
STABLE Logo
STABLE Price(STABLE)
$0.013632
$0.013632$0.013632
+1.39%
USD
STABLE (STABLE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

The post South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Employee sentenced for espionage involving
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/30 04:09
Trust Wallet Faces Wave of Fraudulent Claims After $7 Million Chrome Extension Hack

Trust Wallet Faces Wave of Fraudulent Claims After $7 Million Chrome Extension Hack

Trust Wallet's Christmas security breach has taken an unexpected turn. The company now faces nearly double the number of compensation claims compared to actual
Share
Brave Newcoin2025/12/30 04:32