TLDR China’s rule ends electric-only EV handles, forcing safety-driven redesigns. Tesla faces compliance pressure as retractable doors lose regulator favor. MechanicalTLDR China’s rule ends electric-only EV handles, forcing safety-driven redesigns. Tesla faces compliance pressure as retractable doors lose regulator favor. Mechanical

Tesla (TSLA) Stock: Slides as China’s New Door-Handle Rules Raise Safety Concerns

TLDR

  • China’s rule ends electric-only EV handles, forcing safety-driven redesigns.
  • Tesla faces compliance pressure as retractable doors lose regulator favor.
  • Mechanical access rises in priority after incidents spotlight rescue risks.
  • Carmakers weigh styling shifts to meet China’s 2027 safety mandate.
  • Markets react as EV brands balance innovation with reliable hardware

Tesla (TSLA) is trading at about $462.62, which is down 2.65% on the day after a mostly downward intraday trend.

Tesla, Inc., TSLA

Tesla’s stock traded lower as China introduced strict rules that will prohibit electric-only retractable door handles on new vehicles. The move created fresh concern about product safety standards and market access for several global carmakers. The decision also pushed industry attention toward mechanical systems that work without power.

China’s Rule Change Pressures EV Design

China issued new standards that require all vehicles under 3.5 tons to include mechanical interior and exterior door handles. The rule responds to concerns about power loss and limited access during emergencies, and it forces brands with retractable systems to adjust. The policy will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Regulators said mechanical handles must offer enough hand space and must function regardless of temperature or battery status, and they outlined exact positioning rules. Existing models will receive a transition period to meet parts of the standard, yet new vehicles must follow core requirements immediately. The shift will affect brands that rely heavily on electric-only handle mechanisms.

Tesla uses retractable handles across all current models, and many other EV makers adopted similar designs in recent years. However, China’s directive introduces a major engineering and compliance challenge, and it adds pressure on companies to modify vehicles for the world’s largest auto market. Market reaction reflected these concerns as Tesla’s stock moved down during the day.

Safety Incidents Renew Debate Over EV Door Systems

The rule follows a series of incidents involving retractable handles that reportedly failed during emergencies and created escape difficulties. Officials pointed to cases triggered by crashes, cold weather or sudden power loss, and they argued mechanical releases reduce these risks. First responders also noted issues reaching occupants when handles do not deploy.

Reports linked several fatalities to vehicles with retractable systems, and some cases prompted legal action in other markets. A widely discussed incident involving a Xiaomi electric sedan in 2025 added scrutiny, even though that model included multiple emergency releases. The accumulated attention helped shape China’s final regulatory stance.

Safety agencies in other regions also examine door-handle performance, and future protocols may place greater weight on post-crash usability. Current Australian ratings show strong safety scores for Tesla models, yet the new Chinese standard may encourage broader redesigns. Automakers now face rising pressure to balance styling trends with mechanical reliability.

Global Carmakers Confront New Compliance Demands

The mandate forces Tesla, along with brands such as BYD, Mercedes-Benz and Zeekr, to revise upcoming models for China. Carmakers may need to integrate visible mechanical handles again, and this could influence global design strategies. The shift also signals a regulatory emphasis on simple systems that work under severe conditions.

China remains a core market for EV manufacturers, and compliance there often shapes worldwide product planning. The new rules could increase development costs, but they may also standardize safety expectations across segments. Market reaction reflected uncertainty about redesign timelines and their broader financial impact.

The post Tesla (TSLA) Stock: Slides as China’s New Door-Handle Rules Raise Safety Concerns appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
PROJECT RESCUE Logo
PROJECT RESCUE Price(RESCUE)
$0.03958
$0.03958$0.03958
0.00%
USD
PROJECT RESCUE (RESCUE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025-2031: Is ENS a good investment?

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025-2031: Is ENS a good investment?

Key takeaways: The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them easier to remember. Renaming crypto addresses through ENS will enable users to recollect and write them quickly. Even though Ethereum Name Service is based on the Ethereum blockchain, it uses its cryptocurrency, […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:38