FORMER Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office Engineer Henry C. Alcantara has categorically denied claims that he recanted prior statements made during Senate FORMER Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office Engineer Henry C. Alcantara has categorically denied claims that he recanted prior statements made during Senate

Former Bulacan district engineer denies recanting claims in flood control probe

FORMER Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office Engineer Henry C. Alcantara has categorically denied claims that he recanted prior statements made during Senate Blue Ribbon Committee hearings, his legal counsel confirmed on Tuesday.

In a statement issued by Atty. Emil Karlo L. Joven of ELJ Law Office, Mr. Alcantara’s legal counsel described recent reports circulating on social media and some news outlets as “categorically false and misleading.”

The statement, forwarded to reporters, maintained that Mr. Alcantara remains fully committed to cooperating with the Department of Justice (DoJ) as part of his participation in the Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Program. It added that his participation follows a Memorandum of Agreement with the DoJ, which serves as a prerequisite for regular admission into the program.

“In short, Engr. Alcantara is not recanting his prior statements,” Mr. Joven said. The lawyer further stressed that evaluation of Mr. Alcantara’s statements, alongside those of other parties in related cases, is a matter solely for the state prosecutors, in accordance with law and procedure.

“The general public must remain vigilant and should obtain information only from verified, identifiable, and reliable sources. Any information coming from sources other than the Department of Justice or from the undersigned should be treated with caution for potential inaccuracy,” he added.

Mr. Alcantara was also spotted at the DoJ on Tuesday for matters relating to the witness protection program, according to Justice department spokesman Raphael Niccolo L. Martinez. — Erika Mae P. Sinaking

Market Opportunity
Chainbase Logo
Chainbase Price(C)
$0.08049
$0.08049$0.08049
+0.01%
USD
Chainbase (C) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

The crypto market is up today, with the cryptocurrency market capitalisation rising by 3.6% to $3.33 trillion. At the time of writing, 95 of the top 100 coins have
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/14 20:04