The post Can Chainlink sustain its breakout as whales shift $4.8M in LINK? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Large holders pulled Chainlink [LINK] from BinanceThe post Can Chainlink sustain its breakout as whales shift $4.8M in LINK? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Large holders pulled Chainlink [LINK] from Binance

Can Chainlink sustain its breakout as whales shift $4.8M in LINK?

Large holders pulled Chainlink [LINK] from Binance aggressively, with one whale accumulating 342,557 tokens worth $4.8 million in just two days, tightening exchange supply. This behavior signals deliberate accumulation rather than reactive chasing. 

Whales chose to withdraw during consolidation and early breakout phases, not after vertical expansion. That timing matters because it suggests positioning ahead of continuation. 

Moreover, exchange withdrawals typically reduce near-term selling pressure, especially when broader participation remains stable. 

However, whale activity alone does not guarantee upside. It strengthens the backdrop. Therefore, its importance increases when paired with structural shifts and declining spot supply. 

In Chainlink’s case, whale withdrawals reinforce the idea that large holders expect higher prices rather than preparing to distribute into strength.

Descending channel breakout analyzed

Chainlink price spent months trading inside a clearly defined descending channel, repeatedly forming lower highs and rejecting upside attempts. 

That structure enforced persistent bearish pressure and capped every recovery. This dynamic changed once buyers pushed the price above the channel’s upper boundary near the mid-$14 region. 

Crucially, price did not fall back inside the channel. Instead, it stabilized above former resistance, signaling acceptance rather than exhaustion. 

That behavior reduces the probability of a false breakout. The former channel top now acts as a demand zone where buyers must remain active. 

Above it, $14.69 represents the next friction level tied to prior reactions. A sustained move through that area would expose the broader $20 supply zone, shifting focus toward expansion.

Source: TradingView

Spot outflows suggest sell pressure continues to ease

Spot exchange data supports the structural breakout narrative. Chainlink continues to post negative netflows, with roughly $2.26 million leaving exchanges recently. 

This trend reflects steady withdrawals rather than panic-driven spikes. As a result, available sell-side liquidity on centralized venues appears to thin. 

Moreover, sustained outflows following a breakout often reduce overhead supply during pullbacks, allowing buyers to defend structure more easily. However, negative netflows do not drive prices higher on their own. 

They create favorable conditions. Therefore, continuation depends on buyers stepping in rather than sellers exiting.

In Chainlink’s case, declining exchange balances complement whale accumulation and reinforce the idea that supply-side pressure continues to ease as price holds above reclaimed levels.

Source: CoinGlass

Open Interest rises as traders lean into the move

Derivatives participation has expanded meaningfully, with Open Interest (OI) climbing about 9.5% to roughly $673.5 million at press time. 

This increase points to fresh positioning rather than short-covering. Importantly, traders added exposure after the breakout, not before it. 

That sequencing suggests confidence in the new structure rather than speculative anticipation. However, rising OI also increases sensitivity to volatility if the price stalls. 

Therefore, leverage must align with spot demand to remain constructive. So far, it does. Participation appears measured rather than aggressive. 

Consequently, OI expansion adds fuel to the move while avoiding signs of overcrowding that often precede sharp reversals.

Source: CoinGlass

At the time of writing, OI-Weighted Funding Rates turned positive near 0.0101%, signaling strengthening long-side conviction. 

This shift shows traders willingly pay to maintain exposure. Notably, funding remains controlled instead of spiking sharply. That balance matters because extreme funding typically precedes shakeouts. 

Here, the market reflects confidence without excess. However, positive funding still requires price continuation to remain healthy. If momentum fades, longs could unwind quickly. 

In LINK’s case, funding aligns with rising OI, declining exchange supply, and confirmed structural breakout. 

Consequently, leverage currently supports the bullish setup rather than threatening it, reinforcing the broader expansionary narrative.

Source: CoinGlass

Conclusively, Chainlink’s breakout carries substance as whale accumulation, shrinking exchange supply, rising OI, and positive funding align with a clear structural shift. The market has transitioned from compression to expansion. 

As long as the price remains above the former channel boundary, buyers continue to hold control. This suggests that continuation is still the dominant path forward.

However, downside risks would increase if the structure breaks down, particularly in the event of leverage unwinding.


Final Thoughts

  • Structure, flows, and leverage align, giving buyers a clear technical edge.
  • Continuation remains favored unless price slips back inside the broken channel.
Next: Internet Computer rallies 12% – But THESE levels still stand in ICP’s way

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/can-chainlink-sustain-its-breakout-as-whales-shift-4-8m-in-link/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02551
$0.02551$0.02551
+1.51%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38