A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’sA new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s

Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading

  • A new lawsuit has just alleged that  Coinbase directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, avoided over $1 billion in losses by selling shares during the company’s 2021 direct listing.
  • Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick has just ruled that the lawsuit will proceed.
  • Coinbase board member Marc Andreessen is accused of offloading $118.7 million in stock through his venture firm, Andreessen Horowitz.

A legal battle involving Coinbase has just taken on another turn. A Delaware judge recently decided that a shareholder lawsuit against some of the exchange’s top executives can continue. 

This case is related to how years ago, leaders at the company allegedly used insider information to protect their own wealth, at the expense of investors.

The Coinbase Insider Trading Lawsuit

The legal battle dates back to April 2021, when the company first hit the public markets. 

Unlike most firms, it chose a direct listing, which is different from a traditional initial public offering. Existing shareholders could also sell their stock immediately and there were no lockup periods to stop them from exiting. 

The lawsuit claims that insiders took full advantage of this setup, and Shareholder Adam Grabski, who initially filed the original complaint, is demanding reparations. 

He alleged that directors sold more than $2.9 billion in stock and according to the filing, CEO Brian Armstrong sold roughly $291.8 million himself. 

Chief Operating Officer Emilie Choi and co-founder Fred Ehrsam also reportedly sold hundreds of millions in shares and the plaintiffs believe these leaders knew the stock was overvalued before the public found out.

Why the Judge Rejected the Dismissal Request

The company tried to end this case early, and formed a special litigation committee to investigate the claims. 

This committee spent ten months reviewing the stock sales and eventually cleared the directors of any wrongdoing. They argued that the sales were small and necessary for market liquidity. 

However, Judge McCormick found a problem with the committee itself.

One member of the committee, Gokul Rajaram, has deep ties to board member Marc Andreessen. For context, Andreessen is one of the accused individuals in the Coinbase lawsuit. 

Records show that Rajaram and Andreessen Horowitz participated in at least 50 financing rounds together since 2019 and the judge noted that these “thick ties” create a conflict of interest. 

She did not accuse anyone of acting in bad faith, but noted that the lack of total independence was enough to keep the case alive.

Record Sales and Dropping Valuations

The timing of the stock sales is also another point in this. When the company went public, shares started trading at $381. 

Just five weeks later, the price fell by more than 37%. This drop happened as the firm showed new details about its revenue. It also announced a deal that would dilute existing shares and by mid-May, billions of dollars in market value had vanished.

The lawsuit is pointing to an internal tax valuation that was much lower than the market price, and the plaintiffs argue that directors saw this data and decided to sell before the crash. 

While plaintiffs say that Marc Andreessen allegedly sold $118.7 million through his firm during this window, the defendants strongly deny these claims. 

They argued that the stock price simply follows the movement of Bitcoin, and they insist they were “bullish” on the company and only sold a tiny fraction of their holdings.

The post Armstrong, Other Coinbase Execs Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Insider Trading appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OUSG (OUSG) - Complete Fundamental Analysis

OUSG (OUSG) - Complete Fundamental Analysis

OUSG (OUSG) Cryptocurrency Overview ## Core Technology and Blockchain Architecture OUSG is a tokenized short-term U.S. Treasury bills ETF managed by Ondo Finance

Share
Coinstats2026/02/01 09:01
Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

The post Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Google has announced the launch of a new open-source protocol called Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) in partnership with Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, and 60 other organizations. This allows AI agents to make payments on behalf of users using various methods such as real-time bank transfers, credit and debit cards, and, most importantly, stablecoins. Let’s explore in detail what this could mean for the broader cryptocurrency markets, and also highlight a presale crypto (Best Wallet Token) that could explode as a result of this development. Google’s Push for Stablecoins Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) uses digital contracts known as ‘Intent Mandates’ and ‘Verifiable Credentials’ to ensure that AI agents undertake only those payments authorized by the user. Mandates, by the way, are cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contracts that act as verifiable proof of a user’s instruction. For example, let’s say you instruct an AI agent to never spend more than $200 in a single transaction. This instruction is written into an Intent Mandate, which serves as a digital contract. Now, whenever the AI agent tries to make a payment, it must present this mandate as proof of authorization, which will then be verified via the AP2 protocol. Alongside this, Google has also launched the A2A x402 extension to accelerate support for the Web3 ecosystem. This production-ready solution enables agent-based crypto payments and will help reshape the growth of cryptocurrency integration within the AP2 protocol. Google’s inclusion of stablecoins in AP2 is a massive vote of confidence in dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies and a huge step toward making them a mainstream payment option. This widens stablecoin usage beyond trading and speculation, positioning them at the center of the consumption economy. The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. gives stablecoins more structure and legal support. Imagine paying for things like data crawls, per-task…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:27
RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand

RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand

The post RLUSD Attestation Strengthens Institutional Confidence as Liquidity Venues Expand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. RLUSD is gaining momentum as independent
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/01 09:33