The post Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization afterThe post Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization after

Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why

5 min read

The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization after a sharp sell-off in late January. ETH has rebounded about 4.6% over the past 24 hours after dipping near $2,160. On the surface, this looks like a relief bounce inside a broader falling wedge pattern.

But on-chain data tells a more cautious story. While the bullish structure has not fully broken, long-term holder behavior and profit-loss metrics are weakening. Together, they suggest that this rebound may lack strong conviction. If these trends persist, Ethereum could remain vulnerable to another leg lower, with even $1,500 in sight.

A 37% Price Drop Couldn’t Break Pattern, But There’s A Catch

Since mid-January, Ethereum has fallen nearly 37% to lows around $2,160. The decline followed a clear bearish divergence.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Between January 6 and January 14, ETH made a higher high, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) made a lower high. RSI measures momentum on a 0–100 scale. When price rises, but RSI weakens, it signals fading buying pressure. This divergence often leads to trend reversals, and Ethereum responded accordingly.

Despite the sharp drop, the price has stayed inside a falling wedge. A falling wedge forms when the price makes lower highs and lower lows inside narrowing trendlines. It is usually a bullish structure that signals weakening selling pressure.

Ethereum Holds Structure: TradingView

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

So structurally, Ethereum has not fully broken down. However, something more important has weakened: long-term holder conviction.

Hodler Net Position Change tracks whether long-term investors are accumulating or selling. On January 18, the 30-day net position change peaked near +338,708 ETH. This showed strong accumulation.

By February 2, that figure had collapsed to around +40,953 ETH. That is a drop of nearly 90%.

Hodlers Accumulating Fewer Coins: Glassnode

This means long-term holders have sharply reduced buying during the correction. When conviction holders do not accumulate into weakness, it usually signals that the market has not reached a true bottom. Strong bottoms form when long-term holders keep accumulating even as prices fall. That is not happening now.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Paper Profits And Exchange Transfers Show Rallies Are Being Sold

The second warning comes from Ethereum’s Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) and exchange transfer data.

NUPL measures how much profit or loss holders have on paper. It compares current prices with the average purchase price. When NUPL is high, most investors are in profit. When it turns negative, many are at a loss.

In late January, Ethereum’s NUPL dropped from around 0.25 to near 0.007 by February 1. This shows that profits have almost vanished, but not completely.

NUPL Reset Needed: Glassnode

However, on a one-year view, NUPL is still far from true capitulation.

In April 2025, NUPL fell to −0.22. That marked deep fear and capitulation. After that, ETH rallied from about $1,472 to $4,829, a surge of roughly 228%. Today, NUPL is nowhere near those levels.

Sponsored

Sponsored

This suggests that large-scale capitulation has not happened yet. There may still be room for further downside before a durable bottom forms.

Exchange transfer data adds to this risk. During the late-January drop, numbers of transfers (not coins) fell to around 23,000–24,000 per day. This showed reduced selling pressure near the lows. But during the rebound between February 1 and February 2, transfers jumped to above 37,000.

That is a rise of more than 50% in one day. This means many holders (possibly the speculative ones) used the bounce to move ETH to exchanges and likely sell. When every rebound triggers a spike in transfers, it signals that rallies are being distributed, not accumulated.

Exchange Transfers Surge: Glassnode

This pattern highlights a growing divide between speculative traders and longer-term capital.

Gil Rosen, Co-Founder of the Blockchain Builders Fund, described this split in an exclusive quote to BeInCrypto:

Sponsored

Sponsored

This behavior keeps upward moves weak.

Ethereum Price Levels Show Why $1,500 Is Back in Play

With structure holding but conviction weakening, the Ethereum price levels now matter more than indicators. The first key support sits near $2,250. This level has acted as a short-term base after the rebound.

Below that, $2,160 remains critical. This marks the recent low and is closer to the lower boundary of the falling wedge. A confirmed break below this zone would weaken the bullish Ethereum price structure.

If $2,160 fails and also the lower wedge trendline , risk opens toward the $1,540 region, a key Fib extension level to the downside. This kind of dip would also bring NUPL closer to historical capitulation levels and the price near the April 2025 zone.

Ethereum Price Analysis: TradingView

That is where a deeper reset could occur. On the upside, Ethereum must reclaim $2,690 to change the narrative. This level marks a major Fibonacci resistance and a prior breakdown zone.

Only a sustained move above $2,690 would signal that buyers are regaining control. Until then, rallies between $2,250 and $2,690 are likely to face heavy selling pressure. As long as ETH remains trapped in this range, every bounce risks becoming another exit opportunity.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/ethereum-price-1500-drop-analysis/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15