Michael Burry Flags Structural Breakdown as Bitcoin-Driven Liquidations Hit Silver

The most consequential detail in the late-January liquidation wave wasn’t the size of the sell-off, but where the pressure originated.

As Bitcoin slipped through $73,000, liquidation stress surfaced in silver markets first, even though the underlying shock did not originate there.

That sequencing matters. It reframes the event from a metals-specific unwind into a cross-collateral failure tied directly to crypto-linked leverage.

By early February, this distinction had become central to Michael Burry’s latest warning, where he traced a $1 billion precious-metals liquidation event back to Bitcoin-related margin stress rather than organic selling.

Short-Term Price Action: Crypto Stress Precedes Metals Liquidations

During the end-of-January rout, Bitcoin briefly dipped below $73,000, triggering a wave of forced de-risking across leveraged portfolios. The immediate response was not widespread Bitcoin selling alone, but the liquidation of profitable and highly liquid collateral positions.

Silver became one of the primary outlets. On at least one major exchange, silver-linked liquidations temporarily exceeded those of Bitcoin itself. This inversion is unusual, as silver typically absorbs inflows during periods of macro stress rather than acting as a liquidity source.

The selling pressure was mechanical rather than discretionary. Tokenized silver futures, traded continuously alongside crypto assets, were sold to meet Bitcoin-related margin calls. Price action reflected urgency rather than valuation, with speed and scale overwhelming normal market absorption.

Higher-Timeframe Structure: The “Collateral Death Spiral”

In his February 2, 2026 Substack update, Burry described this dynamic as a “collateral death spiral.” The structure is driven by the 24/7 nature of crypto-macro venues, where losses in one asset class immediately force liquidations in another.

Tokenized metals instruments sit at the center of this structure. These products are not backed by physical metal on a one-to-one basis, yet they trade with the same immediacy as crypto derivatives. When liquidations accelerate, physical markets cannot absorb the volume fast enough, creating a feedback loop of falling prices and further forced selling.

Burry characterized this loop as a liquidity “black hole,” where declining tokenized silver prices intensify collateral stress instead of relieving it. The result is contagion, not diversification, across assets traditionally viewed as safe havens.

Scenarios and Risk: Where Structure Fails

On the constructive side, stabilization in Bitcoin above $73,000 reduces forced collateral sales and allows metals markets to re-price based on physical demand rather than leverage mechanics. In this scenario, silver remains volatile but structurally intact.

Risk escalates if Bitcoin breaches $70,000. Burry warned that such a move could push major corporate holders, including MicroStrategy, toward more than $4 billion in unrealized losses. That threshold would materially impair access to capital markets and accelerate deleveraging across tokenized instruments.

At the extreme, Burry outlined a failure zone near $50,000 for Bitcoin, where miner bankruptcies and a collapse in tokenized futures markets could emerge simultaneously, reinforcing the broader spiral.

Market Takeaway

The late-January liquidation wave did not invalidate precious metals as defensive assets. It exposed a structural vulnerability created by tokenized cross-collateralization.

For now, Bitcoin continues to trade as a speculative asset rather than a safe haven, transmitting stress outward instead of absorbing it. Whether that dynamic persists will depend less on narrative shifts and more on whether crypto markets can sustain leverage without forcing liquidation pressure into assets that were never meant to bear it.

The post Michael Burry Flags Structural Breakdown as Bitcoin-Driven Liquidations Hit Silver appeared first on ETHNews.