The post Kalshi Outperforms Fed Funds Futures on FOMC, CPI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.  Key Insights: Kalshi rate forecasts matched professional surveyThe post Kalshi Outperforms Fed Funds Futures on FOMC, CPI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.  Key Insights: Kalshi rate forecasts matched professional survey

Kalshi Outperforms Fed Funds Futures on FOMC, CPI

 Key Insights:

  • Kalshi rate forecasts matched professional survey accuracy over roughly 150-day horizon.
  • Prediction markets reacted quickly to inflation data and Federal Reserve communications.
  • Kalshi provides full probability distributions unavailable in traditional macro forecasting tools.
Kalshi Outperforms Fed Funds Futures on FOMC, CPI

The Federal Reserve Board’s Finance and Economics Discussion Series published a staff working paper that examined macroeconomic prediction markets on Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated platform. The paper said Kalshi markets can provide “a high-frequency, continuously updated, distributionally rich benchmark” that may help track macro expectations in real time.

The authors, Anthony M. Diercks, Jared Dean Katz, and Jonathan H. Wright, described the work as preliminary. The paper stated it “does not indicate concurrence” by the Board of Governors or other research staff.

Fed paper reviews Kalshi as an expectations tool

The paper reviewed Kalshi contracts tied to inflation, unemployment, GDP growth, payroll releases, recession odds, and Federal Reserve rate decisions. It compared Kalshi-based signals with survey forecasts and with tools that traders often use to read policy expectations.

The authors said surveys can lag fast-moving conditions. They also said many surveys provide point estimates with limited information about uncertainty. The paper described Kalshi markets as a source of probability distributions that update through the day.

Rate forecasts match survey performance in one test

For the federal funds target rate, the paper compared Kalshi’s pricing to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Survey of Market Expectations. It reported that, over an average horizon near 150 days, Kalshi’s average absolute error was close to the error from professional forecasters.

The paper also compared Kalshi with fed funds futures and other rate measures. It said futures can be harder to translate into meeting-specific distributions, while Kalshi contracts can be tied to outcomes at specific meetings.

Moves after data and policy communication

The authors tracked how Kalshi probabilities changed around major releases and official communication. They described fast shifts after inflation data, labor market updates, and policy messaging.

The paper also looked beyond the expected rate path. It examined changes in uncertainty and asymmetry in the distribution. It reported that variance often declined after major data, while the mean response could differ depending on whether the surprise was positive or negative.

Contract design and market access

The paper described Kalshi contracts as event contracts that pay $1 if a defined outcome occurs. It said this structure allows a set of contracts to be used to build a full risk-neutral probability distribution for a variable.

Kalshi began operating in 2021 and is regulated as a “Designated Contract Market,” the paper said. The authors wrote that retail users can access some Kalshi contracts through brokerage platforms, and that market makers support trading in key markets.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/kalshi-outperforms-fed-funds-futures/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04081
$0.04081$0.04081
+2.87%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

The post Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy CEO Phong Le will join
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:48
Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

The White House reportedly took the lead during the latest Crypto Council meeting, narrowing the stablecoin rewards dispute that has delayed progress in the long
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/21 15:30
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28