TLDR McKinsey projects the quantum computing market could reach $72 billion annually by 2035 Infleqtion (INFQ) became the first neutral-atom quantum company to TLDR McKinsey projects the quantum computing market could reach $72 billion annually by 2035 Infleqtion (INFQ) became the first neutral-atom quantum company to

Which are The Best Quantum Computing Stocks for 2026?

2026/03/12 16:01
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • McKinsey projects the quantum computing market could reach $72 billion annually by 2035
  • Infleqtion (INFQ) became the first neutral-atom quantum company to go public on Feb. 17, 2026
  • Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) completed a $110 million acquisition of Luminar Semiconductor and raised $1.55 billion in 2025
  • Sealsq Corp (LAES) is deploying post-quantum security chips to protect against future encryption-breaking threats
  • IonQ (IONQ) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) remain top watchlist picks based on recent trading volume

The quantum computing sector is heating up in 2026. With new public listings, major acquisitions, and billions in fresh capital, investors are paying close attention to this emerging industry.

McKinsey estimates the quantum computing market could grow into a $72 billion annual opportunity by 2035. That’s a market that barely exists today.

For investors willing to take on risk, the potential rewards are substantial. But picking the right companies matters.

Here’s a look at the quantum computing stocks generating the most buzz right now.

The New Kid on the Block: Infleqtion

Infleqtion went public on Feb. 17, 2026. It became the first neutral-atom quantum company to trade on a major exchange.

The stock trades under the ticker INFQ. It closed recently at $11.21 with a market cap around $467 million.

So what makes neutral-atom technology different? Most quantum companies use either trapped ions or superconducting circuits that need extreme cooling. Infleqtion uses regular atoms held in place by laser beams.

The advantage here is scalability. Neutral atoms can be arranged in large, flexible arrays without the complex cooling infrastructure.


INFQ Stock Card
Infleqtion, Inc., INFQ

Infleqtion isn’t just building quantum computers either. The company sells quantum optical clocks, RF receivers, and inertial sensors.

These systems are already in use with NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.K. government.

The company went public with more than $550 million in new funding. It also secured a $2 million U.S. Army contract for navigation systems and is working on a $6.2 million ARPA-E contract for energy grid optimization.

There’s even a partnership with Voyager Technologies to put a quantum atomic clock on the International Space Station. This company ships real hardware to real customers.

Quantum Computing Inc. Takes the Photonics Route

Quantum Computing Inc. trades under the ticker QUBT on NASDAQ. The stock recently traded at $7.72 with a market cap of $1.7 billion.

QCi takes a completely different approach from most quantum companies. Instead of superconducting circuits or trapped ions, it builds quantum systems using photonics.

That means manipulating particles of light rather than subatomic particles. The big advantage is that photonic quantum systems can operate at room temperature.

No massive, expensive cryogenic cooling required.


QUBT Stock Card
Quantum Computing, Inc., QUBT

In February 2026, QCi completed its $110 million all-cash acquisition of Luminar Semiconductor. This was a strategic supply chain move.

Luminar Semiconductor manufactures lasers, detectors, and advanced packaging. These are exactly the photonic components QCi needs to build compact, mass-producible quantum systems.

The company now controls the entire photonics signal chain from light generation through detection and processing.

QCi also raised $1.55 billion in capital during 2025. That’s an enormous financial cushion for a company this size.

The manufacturing platform is fully domestic. This positions QCi well for government and defense contracts as reshoring initiatives continue.

The company offers Dirac systems, which are portable, low-power quantum computers that operate at room temperature. It also sells quantum random number generators and quantum authentication solutions.

The Security Play: Sealsq Corp

Here’s a question most quantum investors aren’t asking. What happens to cybersecurity when quantum computers become powerful enough to break current encryption?

Every device connected to the internet becomes vulnerable. Sealsq Corp is building hardware to prevent that.

The stock trades under LAES on NASDAQ. It recently closed at $4.25 with a market cap around $784 million.


LAES Stock Card
SEALSQ Corp, LAES

Sealsq specializes in post-quantum semiconductors. These are chips embedded with quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms.

They’re designed to protect against “harvest-now, decrypt-later” attacks. That’s when adversaries collect encrypted data today with plans to decrypt it once quantum computers are powerful enough.

This is already happening.

In January 2026, the company confirmed active U.S. deployments of its post-quantum semiconductor-based trust anchors. This coincided with the official launch of the “Year of Quantum Security 2026” in Washington, D.C.

Sealsq products are deployed across multi-factor authentication tokens, smart energy systems, medical devices, defense infrastructure, and automotive applications.

The Established Players: IonQ and D-Wave

IonQ and D-Wave Quantum remain the most-watched quantum computing stocks based on recent trading volume.

IonQ trades under IONQ. The company develops general-purpose quantum computing systems and sells access to quantum computers of various qubit capacities.

Customers can access IonQ’s quantum computers through Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and Google Cloud Marketplace. The company also offers its own cloud service.


IONQ Stock Card
IonQ, Inc., IONQ

Recent earnings results have been strong. Analysts are noting that IonQ may be changing the quantum narrative with its latest quarterly performance.

D-Wave Quantum trades under QBTS. The company offers Advantage, its fifth-generation quantum computer.

D-Wave also provides Ocean, a suite of open-source Python tools, and Leap, a cloud-based service offering real-time access to live quantum computers.


QBTS Stock Card
D-Wave Quantum Inc., QBTS

The Leap platform includes access to hybrid solvers, development kits, demos, and learning resources.

Both companies represent more established plays in the quantum space. But they still carry the speculative nature common to the entire sector.

What Investors Should Know

All quantum computing stocks come with serious risks. These are speculative, long-horizon investments.

Technical challenges remain. Execution risk is high. Regulatory uncertainties exist.

Most of these companies trade on future expectations rather than current revenues. Quantum Computing Inc. reported a gross margin of negative 67,346% recently. That’s not a typo.

The potential upside is what draws investors in. If quantum advantage arrives and these companies are positioned correctly, returns could be exceptional.

But timing is uncertain. Commercial viability at scale remains years away for most applications.

For investors building a watchlist, the sector offers several different approaches to quantum technology. Neutral atoms, photonics, superconducting circuits, trapped ions, and post-quantum security all represent different bets on how this industry develops.

Recent Developments Worth Noting

Infleqtion has multiple collaborations with Nvidia. The partnership produced the world’s first demonstration of a materials science application using logical qubits.

Sealsq announced a partnership with Trusted Semiconductor Solutions. The deal supplies U.S. government and enterprise customers with post-quantum-ready semiconductor platforms.

QCi’s vertical integration strategy through the Luminar acquisition gives it control over manufacturing that competitors lack.

IonQ continues expanding cloud access partnerships with major tech providers.

D-Wave maintains a developer community through its Leap platform that helps drive adoption.

The quantum computing sector saw record capital inflows in 2025. That money is now being deployed across hardware development, acquisitions, and government contracts.

Trading volume in quantum stocks has increased as more investors add these names to their portfolios.

Sealsq confirmed active U.S. deployments of post-quantum security hardware in January 2026, marking a shift from development to commercial deployment.

The post Which are The Best Quantum Computing Stocks for 2026? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.002876
$0.002876$0.002876
+1.08%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55
Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Author: G3ronimo Compiled by: TechFlow HyperLiquid has grown into a mature crypto-native exchange, with the majority of its net fees programmatically distributed directly to token holders through an "Assistance Fund" (AF). This design makes $HYPE one of the few tokens capable of being valued based on cash flow. To date, most valuations of HyperLiquid have relied on traditional multiples, comparing it to established financial platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood, using EBITDA or revenue multiples as a reference. Unlike traditional corporate stocks, where management typically retains and reinvests earnings at their discretion, HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of transaction fees directly to token holders through a support fund. This model creates predictable and quantifiable cash flows, making it well-suited for detailed discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis rather than static multiple comparisons. Our methodology begins by determining $HYPE's cost of capital. We then invert the current market price to determine the market-implied future earnings. Finally, we apply growth projections to these earnings streams and compare the resulting intrinsic value to today's market price, revealing the valuation gap between current pricing and fundamental value. Why choose discounted cash flow (DCF) over a multiple? While other valuation methods compare HyperLiquid to Coinbase and Robinhood via EBITDA multiples, these methods have the following limitations: The difference between the corporate and token structures: Coinbase and Robinhood are corporate stocks, whose capital allocation is guided by the board of directors, and profits are retained and reinvested by management; while HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of trading fees directly to token holders through a relief fund. Direct Cash Flow: HyperLiquid's design generates predictable cash flows that are well-suited to DCF models, rather than static multiples. Growth and risk characteristics: DCFs are able to explicitly model different growth scenarios and risk adjustments, whereas multiples may not adequately capture growth and risk dynamics. Determining an appropriate discount rate To determine our cost of equity, we start with reference data from the public market and adjust for cryptocurrency-specific risks: Cost of equity (r) ≈ Risk-free rate + β × Market risk premium + Crypto/illiquidity premium Beta Analysis Based on regression analysis with the S&P 500: Robinhood (HOOD): Beta of 2.5, implied cost of equity of 15.6%; Coinbase (COIN): Beta of 2.0, implied cost of equity of 13.6%; HyperLiquid (HYPE): Beta is 1.38 and the implied cost of equity is 10.5%. At first glance, $HYPE appears to have a lower beta, and therefore a lower cost of equity than Robinhood and Coinbase. However, the R² value reveals an important limitation: HOOD: The S&P 500 explains 50% of its returns; COIN: The S&P 500 explains 34% of its return; HYPE: The S&P 500 only explains 5% of its returns. $HYPE’s low R² suggests that traditional stock market factors are insufficient to explain its price fluctuations, and crypto-native risk factors need to be considered. risk assessment Despite $HYPE’s lower beta, we still adjust its discount rate from 10.5% to 13% (which is more conservative compared to COIN’s 13.6% and HOOD’s 15.6%) for the following reasons: Lower governance risk: Direct programmatic distribution of 93% of fees reduces concerns about corporate governance. In contrast, COIN and HOOD do not return any earnings to shareholders, and their capital allocation is determined by management. Higher Market Risk: $HYPE is a crypto-native asset and is subject to additional regulatory and technological uncertainties. Liquidity considerations: Token markets are generally less liquid than established stock markets. Get the Market Implied Price (MIP) Using our 13% discount rate, we can reverse engineer the market’s implied earnings expectations at the current $HYPE token price of approximately $54: Current market expectations: 2025: Total revenue of $700 million 2026: Total revenue of $1.4 billion Terminal growth: 3% annual growth thereafter These assumptions yield an intrinsic value of approximately $54, which is consistent with current market prices. This suggests that the market is pricing in modest growth based on current fee levels. At this point we need to ask a question: Does the market-implied price (MIP) reflect future cash flows? Alternative growth scenarios @Keisan_Crypto presents an attractive 2-year and 5-year bull market scenario. Original tweet link: Click here Two-year bull market forecast According to @Keisan_Crypto’s analysis, if HyperLiquid achieves the following goals: Annualized fees: $3.6 billion Aid fund income: $3.35 billion (93% of fees) Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $128 (140% undervalued at current price) Related links Five-year bull market scenario Under a five-year bull market scenario (link), he predicts that transaction fees will reach $10 billion annually, with $9.3 billion accruing to $HYPE. He assumes HyperLiquid's global market share will grow from its current 5% to 50% by 2030. Even if it doesn't reach 50% market share, these figures are still achievable with a smaller market share as global trading volumes continue to grow. Five-year bull market forecast Annualized fees: $10 billion Aid fund income: $9.3 billion Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $385 (600% undervalued at current price) Related links While this valuation is lower than Keisan's $1,000 target, the difference stems from our assumption of normalized earnings growth at 3% annually thereafter, while Keisan's model uses a cash flow multiple. We believe using cash flow multiples to project long-term value is problematic, as market multiples are volatile and can vary significantly over time. Furthermore, the multiples themselves incorporate earnings growth assumptions, while using the same cash flow multiple five years from now as one or two years later implies that growth levels from 2030 onward will be consistent with those in 2026/2027. Therefore, the multiples are more appropriate for short-term asset pricing. However, regardless of which model is used, $HYPE remains undervalued; this is a subtle difference. Additional Value Driver: USDH Under the Native Market model, USDH will use 50% of its stablecoin revenue for buybacks similar to a bailout fund. As a result, $HYPE can increase its free cash flow by $100 million (50% of $200 million) annually. Looking ahead five years, if USDH's market capitalization reaches $25 billion (currently still one-third of USDC's, and an even smaller portion of the total stablecoin market five years from now), its annual revenue could reach $1 billion. Following the same 50% distribution model, this would generate an additional $500 million in free cash flow per year for the aid fund. This would value each token at over $400. Excluding Value Drivers: HIP-3 and HyperEVM This DCF analysis intentionally excludes two important potential value drivers that are not amenable to cash flow modeling. Clearly, these would provide additional incremental value and could therefore be evaluated separately using different valuation methodologies and then added to this valuation. Summarize Our DCF analysis indicates that if HyperLiquid can maintain its growth trajectory and market position, the $HYPE token is significantly undervalued. The token's unique feature of programmatic fee distribution makes it particularly suitable for cash flow-based valuation methodologies. Methodological Notes This analysis builds on research by @Keisan_Crypto and @GLC_Research. The DCF model is open source and can be modified at the following link: https://valypto.xyz/project/hyperliquid/oNQraQIg Market data and forecasts are subject to change, and models should be updated promptly based on the latest information.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 08:00