A technical debate erupted on X after on-chain analyst Willy Woo published what he called a “DUMMIES GUIDE TO BEING QUANTUM SAFE,” urging Bitcoin holders to migrate coins away from Taproot addresses (bc1p) to SegWit bc1q or older P2PKH/P2SH formats and to avoid spending until post-quantum protections are available. How To Make Bitcoin “Quantum-Safe” “In […]A technical debate erupted on X after on-chain analyst Willy Woo published what he called a “DUMMIES GUIDE TO BEING QUANTUM SAFE,” urging Bitcoin holders to migrate coins away from Taproot addresses (bc1p) to SegWit bc1q or older P2PKH/P2SH formats and to avoid spending until post-quantum protections are available. How To Make Bitcoin “Quantum-Safe” “In […]

Expert Reveals Bitcoin Quantum Survival Plan: Here’s What You Can Do

2025/11/13 04:00

A technical debate erupted on X after on-chain analyst Willy Woo published what he called a “DUMMIES GUIDE TO BEING QUANTUM SAFE,” urging Bitcoin holders to migrate coins away from Taproot addresses (bc1p) to SegWit bc1q or older P2PKH/P2SH formats and to avoid spending until post-quantum protections are available.

How To Make Bitcoin “Quantum-Safe”

“In the past it was about protecting your PRIVATE KEY (your seed phrase). In the age of big scary quantum computers (BSQC) that are coming, you need to protect your PUBLIC KEY also. Basically a BSQC can figure out your private key from a public key. The present day taproot addresses (the latest format) are NOT safe, these are addresses starting with “bc1p” and they embed the public key into the address, not good,” Woo wrote on Nov. 11.

His argument hinges on a well-understood distinction in Bitcoin script types: Taproot (P2TR) encodes a public key directly in the output and address, while legacy formats like P2PKH/P2SH and SegWit P2WPKH hash the public key and reveal it only when coins are spent. That architectural difference matters in a future where a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a private key from a revealed public key. Independent references note that P2TR indeed carries a public key in the output, whereas P2PKH conceals it until spend time.

Woo’s interim playbook is blunt: move UTXOs to bc1q (or “1”/“3”) addresses, continue receiving to that address, but “NEVER send BTC out of it” until Bitcoin ships a quantum-resistant upgrade—at which point holders should move during low congestion, minimizing the window in which a public key is exposed in the mempool: “Send your BTC into the new quantum safe address when the network is NOT congested, once you send, you reveal the private key for a short time. It’s unlikely a BSQC will steal your coins in that short window.”

He also warned that P2PK “Satoshi-era” outputs are most at risk and suggested that lost coins with prior spending history could be vulnerable. “Satoshi’s 1M coins using an ancient P2PK address will be stolen (unless a future softfork freezes them),” he wrote, adding that ETFs, treasuries, and exchange cold storage “can be quantum resistant if the custodians take action” well before any soft fork.

Woo characterized industry expectations as “2030 onwards” for the arrival of “Q-Day,” while stressing that standards for quantum resistance are already rolling out across the wider cryptography space.

Former Bitcoin Core maintainer Jonas Schnelli agreed with the hygiene but pushed back on the framing. He called Woo’s plan a prudent mitigation for unspent coins—“P2PKH gives you years of protection while Taproot exposes your pubkey immediately”—yet rejected the term “quantum safe.”

In Schnelli’s view, the moment any spend is broadcast, “your pubkey hits the mempool. A quantum attacker could crack your key and RBF double-spend before your transaction confirms (~10 minutes).” He concluded: “It’s a smart precaution, not a permanent solution.”

At press time, BTC traded at $104,693.

Bitcoin price
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto On Alert: Raoul Pal Hints At Macro Twist Post-US Govt Shutdown

Crypto On Alert: Raoul Pal Hints At Macro Twist Post-US Govt Shutdown

As the latest US government shutdown ends and markets refocus on macro plumbing, Raoul Pal has sketched out a strikingly liquidity-heavy roadmap on X – one that, in his framework, has direct implications for crypto. “So now the US Gov has reopened, what’s next?” Pal asks. He immediately points to the Treasury General Account (TGA): “Expect a few days for TGA spending to begin to significantly add to liquidity and should persist for several months.Obviously, QT ends in Dec and the balance sheet will crawl higher. We should see the dollar begin to weaken again.” Mechanically, TGA drawdowns push cash back into bank reserves and money markets, reversing the reserve drain that built up while the government was partially shut. At the same time, the Federal Reserve has already confirmed that quantitative tightening (QT) will end on December 1, 2025, shifting from active balance-sheet reduction to full reinvestment of maturing Treasuries and a more “maintenance” stance. When Will Crypto Prices Rise Again? Pal’s point is that both channels tilt the system toward more dollars sloshing through funding markets, a backdrop he has long argued is constructive for risk assets, including crypto. The near-term risk, in his view, is a classic year-end funding squeeze. “The next key step is to avoid a Year End funding squeeze. Expect several ‘temporary’ measures to add liquidity. Term Funding and SRF operations are most likely.” Related Reading: SEC Chair Sets Out Plans For Crypto Taxonomy To Define Digital Asset Classification Here he is referring to term repo or funding facilities and the Standing Repo Facility (SRF), which the Fed can scale up to backstop banks’ access to cash if overnight rates spike. That reading aligns with recent Fed communication that elevated SRF usage and tighter money-market conditions were central reasons for ending QT early. Pal then escalates from tactical tools to structural regulation: “That will eventually morph into the desperately needed changes to the SLR to allow banks to absorb more issuance and re-lever their balance sheets. This is a big liquidity bazooka. Expect in Q1. SLR should lower rates as banks buy more bonds.” The Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) caps large banks’ overall balance-sheet size, regardless of asset risk. Loosening it for Treasuries and reserves has been debated for years as a way to let dealers warehouse more government debt without breaching constraints. If regulators move in that direction, it would, as Pal notes, free capacity for banks to buy more bonds and could exert downward pressure on yields—again easing financial conditions. Related Reading: The 2025 Year-End Crypto Outlook: The Catalysts That Will Decide Everything For crypto, that matters indirectly: Pal’s core macro thesis is that improving liquidity and lower real yields are the primary tailwinds for digital assets. Regulation is explicitly on his radar too: “Also expect CLARITY Act for crypto to begin to get finalized.” The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (“CLARITY Act”) has already passed the US House and is now before the Senate. It would define digital asset categories and divide oversight between the CFTC and SEC, replacing much of the current “regulation by enforcement” model. Pal’s remark signals his expectation that the shutdown’s end clears the way for renewed legislative momentum – a key piece of the institutional puzzle for non-bitcoin crypto. He closes by broadening the lens to global and fiscal policy: “There will also be stimulus payments and the Big Beautiful Bill fiscal goosing. China will continue balance sheet expansion. Europe will add fiscal stimulus or extra spending. The debts must be rolled and the Gov wants to super heat the economy into the Mid-Terms. This is the Liquidity Flood…. the spice must flow.” Taken together, Pal is describing a synchronised regime: post-shutdown TGA spending, the end of QT, potential SLR relief, progressing US crypto legislation, and ongoing fiscal and monetary support in China and Europe. For crypto investors who share his liquidity-centric lens, the message is not subtle: the macro “spice,” in his view, is about to flow again. At press time, the total crypto market cap dropped to $3.24 trillion. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/11/14 22:00