The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse. Lawsuit Claims Inflated …The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse. Lawsuit Claims Inflated …

FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback

2025/09/24 13:12
FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit

The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse.

Lawsuit Claims Inflated Investments in Crypto Mining Firm

Filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, the complaint alleges that Sam Bankman-Fried directed Alameda Research, FTX’s sister trading firm, to funnel customer funds into GDA at inflated prices.

According to the filing, between 2021 and 2022, Alameda:

  • Spent over $500 million on 154 preferred shares of GDA.
  • Wired another $550.9 million directly to GDA’s co-founders, Rashit Makhat and Marco Krohn.

The lawsuit argues these deals were not just reckless but deliberately structured to benefit Bankman-Fried personally. Since he owned 90% of Alameda, he would “capture nearly all the upside from GDA’s inflated valuation while shifting the financial risks onto FTX customers and creditors,” the complaint states.

Red Flags in Kazakhstan Energy Crisis Ignored

The FTX Recovery Trust lawsuit also highlights that Bankman-Fried disregarded significant warning signs. At the time of the investment, Kazakhstan—where GDA was based—was experiencing a severe energy crisis, raising concerns about the company’s future operations.

The filing claims Bankman-Fried relied on financial statements that “bore no relation to reality,” showing what the trust describes as mismanagement and disregard for customer funds.

“These were commingled and misappropriated funds,” the lawsuit says, framing the GDA deals as another chapter in Bankman-Fried’s broader fraud.

  • Also Read :
  •   FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Faces Appeal on November 4
  •   ,

FTX Recovery Trust Continues Clawback Efforts

This lawsuit is just one part of ongoing recovery efforts. In 2023, a U.S. bankruptcy court approved a $175 million settlement with Genesis Global Trading, a separate entity from GDA.

Meanwhile, the restructuring team has been working to return money to FTX customers and creditors. So far, the trust has distributed:

  • $1.2 billion earlier this year
  • $5 billion in May 2025
  • A fresh payout of $1.6 billion is scheduled for September 30, 2025

Each successful clawback brings creditors closer to recovering lost funds, though the process remains long and litigious.

Bankman-Fried’s Legacy of Fraud Still Haunts Creditors

Sam Bankman-Fried is already serving time for fraud, but the FTX bankruptcy litigation shows the ripple effects of his decisions continue. The GDA lawsuit underscores the scale of alleged mismanagement and the difficult task of untangling the exchange’s financial web.

For creditors, the hope is clear that every lawsuit and settlement is one step closer to recovering billions lost in the FTX collapse.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Why is the FTX Recovery Trust suing Genesis Digital Assets?

The FTX Recovery Trust is suing to claw back over $1 billion that Sam Bankman-Fried allegedly funneled into Genesis Digital Assets at inflated prices, using FTX customer funds.

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Genesis Digital Assets?

The lawsuit claims Sam Bankman-Fried used customer funds to buy GDA shares at inflated prices and wired over $550 million directly to its founders, ignoring financial red flags.

How does the Genesis Digital Assets lawsuit affect FTX creditors?

Each successful lawsuit, like this one against GDA, helps recover funds. The money is then distributed to creditors, bringing them closer to recovering their lost investments.

What are “clawback” lawsuits in the FTX bankruptcy case?

“Clawback” lawsuits are legal actions taken to recover funds that were improperly or fraudulently transferred out of FTX before its collapse, so they can be returned to creditors.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Next Bitcoin Story Of 2025

The Next Bitcoin Story Of 2025

The post The Next Bitcoin Story Of 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 18 September 2025 | 07:39 Bitcoin’s rise from obscure concept to a global asset is the playbook every serious investor pores over, and it still isn’t done writing; Bitcoin now trades above $115,000, a reminder that the life-changing runs begin before most people are even looking. T The question hanging over this cycle is simple: can a new contender compress that arc, faster, cleaner, earlier, while the window is still open for those willing to move first? Coins still on presales are the ones can repeat this story, and among those coins, an Ethereum based meme coin catches most of the attention, as it’s team look determined to make an impact in today’s market, fusing culture with working tools, with a design built to reward early movers rather than late chasers. If you’re hunting the next asymmetric shot, this is where momentum and mechanics meet, which is why many traders quietly tag this exact meme coin as the best crypto to buy now in a crowded market. Before we dive deeper, take a quick rewind through the case study every crypto desk knows by heart: how Bitcoin went from about $0.0025 to above $100,000, and turned a niche experiment into the story that still sets the bar for everything that follows. Bitcoin 2010-2025 Price History Back to first principles: a strange internet money appears in 2010 and then, step by step, rewires the entire market, Bitcoin’s arc from about $0.0025 to above $100,000 is the case study every desk still cites because it proves one coin can move the entire game. In 2009 almost no one guessed the destination; launched on January 3, 2009, Bitcoin picked up a price signal in 2010 when the pizza trade valued BTC near $0,0025 while early exchange quotes lived at fractions of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 12:41
Share