Digital identity underpins how we access services online, but centralized systems create risks of breaches, misuse, and loss of control. Decentralized models — blockchain, self-sovereign identity, and verifiable credentials — aim to return ownership of data to users. Each model has pros and cons, and choosing depends on security needs, scalability, and budget.Digital identity underpins how we access services online, but centralized systems create risks of breaches, misuse, and loss of control. Decentralized models — blockchain, self-sovereign identity, and verifiable credentials — aim to return ownership of data to users. Each model has pros and cons, and choosing depends on security needs, scalability, and budget.

I - vengers: Identity Wars

2025/10/02 02:44

\

\ What an efficient label to encapsulate such a concept of great practical and philosophical depth. Like an ominous name pronounced by a wise sage with outstretched arms to capture a rather illusive and mysterious phenomenon. Picture yoda making that discovery.

\

\ A rather more general term though, this article will be focusing on a more specific aspect of Identity known as digital identity. Digital identity is basically how your information is managed online for proper identification and management. Digital identity is something that we rarely think about in our day-to-day lives, but it is something that we all have subscribed to.

\ Currently, the average person, and likely you reading this, has over 150 accounts online, each with a separate username, password and security process. Think of the likes of Facebook, X (Twitter), Instagram, Signal, Amazon, Telegram, Deliveroo, Uber… the list goes on.

\ Every time we open an account online, to use a service, buy something online, use social media, or even just browse the internet, we are creating a digital footprint for ourselves, which feeds into a digital profile. And each of these different accounts holds personal data about you, such as your name, age, photographs, sex, gender etc., and also various preference data, such as what you browse, like, share or click on. These digital profiles are generally secured behind a password, meaning that you feel a level of confidence that you have control over them.

\

However, in reality this is not the case. Our data is stored across multiple gated siloes, and every time we want to access this data, we need to prove to the gatekeeper that we are who we claim to be through an authentication process. In other words, every time you want to get access to your own digital identity data, you need to get through a locked door using a key. This established way of managing digital identity is known as centralized identity management.

\ There are many problems with this model and a few of them are as follows:

\

  • Data is vulnerable to breaches from a single point of failure (i.e. the server)

  • Companies can do as they please with user data e.g. selling to ad companies.

  • Difficulty in managing user data across several accounts.

    \

These numerous problems have predictably resulted in the rise of several innovations to offer alternative identity management solutions in cyberspace creating a rather entertaining identity management war.

\ Identity Wars?

\

\ Well, you may find the topic “I - vengers: Indentity Wars” rather nerdy right?

\ Lol… me too.

\ However, the tech field can be quite difficult to understand and as the alpha nerd of this story I'd rather carry everyone along with what I believe to be a more friendly reference - The Avengers series.

\ Let's summarize our introduction like this.

\

\

\ We shall now proceed to explore these models and technologies in detail.

\

Types of identity management.

\

  1. Centralized Identity Model:

\ Here, all user identity data like usernames, passwords etc. is stored in a single, central location. It is easy to manage and scale, however, there is a single point of failure. If the central database is compromised, all user data could be exposed.

\

Examples Of Centralized Identity Models

\ I. Directory Service is a centralized identity system that stores user information in a central database for authentication and access. For example, Yahoo small business.

Yahoo small business provides web hosting, domain registration, and business related services for small businesses. The directory website design is user friendly and well structured, with clear navigation menus. It provides essential information for small business owners.

\ II. Identity Federation is a system that allows users to authenticate to multiple websites and applications using a single set of credentials. For example, academic websites like claerine.eu.

A university student can use their identity federation credentials to sign in to the university's website, the library's website, and the student union's website. The student only has to remember one set of credentials and their identity is verified once by the central identity provider.

\ III. Cloud-based Identity Management Platforms is a system that can be used to manage user access to applications and resources. Such platforms offer a variety of features, including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and user provisioning. For example, Google Cloud.

A company can use a cloud-based identity management platform to manage user access to its internal applications, such as its email system and its customer relationship management (CRM) system. It can also be used to manage user access to external applications.

\

2. Decentralized Identity Model:

In this model, user identity data is distributed across multiple locations. This data is stored securely, and it is only accessible to the user and the entities that the user has authorized to access it.

Decentralized identity models offer several advantages over centralized identity models. They are more secure, as there is no single point of failure. They are also more user-friendly, as users only have to manage one set of credentials.

However, decentralized identity models can be more difficult to manage and scale than centralized identity models. Also, they may not be compatible with all existing applications and systems.

\

Examples Of Decentralized Identity Models

\

  1. Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that can be used to create decentralized identity systems. In a decentralized identity system using blockchain, users' identity data is stored in a tamper-proof distributed ledger. This data is only accessible to the user and the entities that the user has authorized to access it. For example, cheqd.io.

cheqd is a blockchain network, built in the Cosmos ecosystem, designed to achieve three core missions:

  • To enable individuals and organisations to have digital, trustworthy interactions directly with each other, whilst maintaining privacy and without any centralised intermediary needed.

  • To facilitate the creation of new trusted ecosystems or business models across several industries, through the decentralised identity and Verifiable Credentials technology, plus the use of their token $CHEQ for credential payments.

  • To bridge the DeFi ecosystem with the decentralised identity ecosystem, for better user experiences, democratic governance, regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.

    \

  1. Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is a decentralized identity model that gives users control over their identity data. In an SSI system, users own their identity data and can share it with entities that they trust. Users can also revoke access to their identity data at any time.

    SSI systems are based on several key principles:

  • Self-ownership of all user data.
  • Portability of data between users.
  • Interoperability between SSI systems.

For example cheqd SSI and Nordivo.

Nordivo enables you to engage with decentralized identity for your products and services and plug into the new identity layer of the internet with verifiable credentials.

\ Verifiable Credentials (VC), are digital credentials that can be verified by anyone, can be used to verify a person's identity, education, or other attributes. For example, students can use VC to prove their academic achievements to potential employers or universities. This can help to reduce the need for paper transcripts and make it easier for students to transfer credits between institutions.

\

Centralized Identity Versus Decentralized Identity.

The flier below compares centralized identity management and decentralized identity management under several key aspects.

\

As you can see, each of the models has their area of strength and weakness but decentralized models tend to have more advantages than disadvantages.

\

Which model do I want?

The model you should consider depends on your specific needs. Are you building a product or you're just a user? What kind of product are you building? What's your budget and long term plan?

\

\ Whatever the answer is below are some factors you should consider before making a choice.

\

  • The size and complexity of your company: If you have a small company with a few employees, you may be able to get away with using a simple centralized identity management solution. However, if you have a large company with a complex IT infrastructure, you will need a more robust and scalable solution.
  • The types of applications and systems that you use: If you use a lot of different applications and systems, you will need an identity management solution that can integrate with all of them. This can be a challenge, as not all identity management solutions are compatible with all applications and systems.
  • The security requirements of your company: If you have a high-security environment, you will need an identity management solution that can provide a high level of security. This may require a solution that uses two-factor authentication, single sign-on, and other security features.
  • The budget that you have available: Identity management solutions can range in price from a few hundred dollars to several thousand dollars. You will need to decide how much you are willing to spend on an identity management solution, and then choose a solution that fits your budget.
  • The future growth of your company: If you are planning on growing your company shortly, you will need to choose an identity management model that can scale with your growth.
  • The needs of your users: You will need to choose an identity management model that is easy for your users to use. This is especially important if you have a large number of users or if your users are not tech-savvy.

\

In Conclusion:

Welcome audience to the end of this briefing. You've explored the digital identity wars in great detail. As a user or developer of this technology, you've been equipped with all the necessary information to take a winning position on your digital identity campaign. You shall now explore the technologies highlighted or share this piece to spread the identity gospel.

\

\

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Plasma CEO and Founder Paul Faecks Defends Team Amid XPL Token Selloff

Plasma CEO and Founder Paul Faecks Defends Team Amid XPL Token Selloff

The post Plasma CEO and Founder Paul Faecks Defends Team Amid XPL Token Selloff appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Plasma (XPL) CEO and Founder Paul Faecks has defended the team members from a previous unconfirmed allegation circulating through social media. Paul has posted on X stating that the rumors circulating, since the launch of XPL, are not grounded in truth thus causing the community’s fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD). Plasma Founder Defends the Project During the past few days, the XPL holders were hit with rumors that the same developers of Blast (BLAST) and Blur (BLUR) migrated to Plasma. Notably, both Blast and Blur projects have suffered heavy losses in the last few months, with their respective tokens still down around 90% at press time. As such, Paul issued three defensive tackles to set the records straight: No team members have sold any XPL – Paul reassured the Plasma community that investors and team members’ XPL tokens have been locked for three years with a one-year cliff. Professional Plasma team – according to Paul, the Plasma team consists of around 50 members with three members having a background from Blast and Blur. He noted that the Plasm team also came from Google, Facebook, Square, Temasek, Goldman Sachs, and Nuvei. No communication with Wintermute – According to Paul, Plasma has not engaged with the Wintermute market maker. “We are laser-focused on building the future of money and won’t be commenting further. We remain incredibly grateful for our community’s support. Now back to work,” Paul noted.  XPL Price Remains Under Pressure After a highly hyped market launch, the XPL price has dropped over 43% in the last four days to trade about 94 cents at press time. During the past 24 hours, XPL price dropped 6.6% while the wider crypto market gained in value.  Nonetheless, XPL and Plasma are well-positioned to grow exponentially ahead amid the mainstream adoption of stablecoins. According to market data from CoinMarketCap, XPL has a market cap of about $1.69 billion and a 24 hour average traded volume of around $2.89 billion.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/02 06:51
Share
Leading Democrat Wyden Continues Probe Into Pantera Founder Morehead's Taxes

Leading Democrat Wyden Continues Probe Into Pantera Founder Morehead's Taxes

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, is continuing his inquiry into whether Dan Morehead, the founder of asset manager Pantera Capital, sought to avoid paying taxes through his move to Puerto Rico.Wyden's probe into whether Morehead committed tax evasion began in January, and is focused on how the Pantera founder reported taxes on his share of proceeds after a large crypto sale by the firm. According to a press release, Wyden is specifically looking at whether Morehead "misrepresent[ed] his residency status" when Pantera generated over $1 billion in capital gains from crypto sales by claiming his profits from the sale came while he was in Puerto Rico. Residents of the U.S. territory do not pay income tax on capital gains."It is my understanding your share of these gains … was hundreds of millions of dollars," Wyden said in the letter, sent on Wednesday. "It is also my understanding that you treated the entire [gain] as exempt from U.S. tax, even though the lion’s share of these gains accrued while you still resided in California. These are serious allegations of potential abuse of Puerto Rico tax incentives to avoid the payment of U.S. taxes that you must immediately address."Wyden's letter alleged that Morehead's attorneys "have all but disappeared" despite initially engaging with his staff. He also said in the letter that he believes Morehead was advised by Jeffrey Rubinger, a Miami-based attorney who advised another client who "recently pled guilty to a tax fraud scheme" tied to the same Puerto Rico tax rules.A Pantera spokesperson referred CoinDesk to a previous statement from Morehead, when he told the New York Times in a statement earlier this year that, "I believe I acted appropriately with respect to my taxes."Wyden's probe does not carry the full weight of an investigation by the Senate Finance Committee at the moment, given Democrats are the minority party in the Senate and committee Chair Mike Crapo — the top Republican on the committee — does not appear to have joined in the inquiry at this time.Wyden's letter came the same day the Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on crypto tax issues specifically. Witnesses at the hearing warned that the IRS may soon face a deluge of tax reporting.Read more: U.S. Senate Hearing on Crypto Taxes Reveals Headaches for Both Industry and IRS
Share
Coinstats2025/10/02 06:33
Share