The post Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports. On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell. League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.” Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides. Why Grimes Shouldn’t… The post Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports. On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell. League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.” Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides. Why Grimes Shouldn’t…

Sixers, Quentin Grimes Would Both Lose If He Accepts $8.7 Million Qualifying Offer

2025/09/27 21:10

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – FEBRUARY 11: Quentin Grimes #5 of the Philadelphia 76ers looks on against the Toronto Raptors at the Wells Fargo Center on February 11, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Raptors defeated the 76ers 106-103. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images)

Getty Images

It’s appearing increasingly unlikely that the Philadelphia 76ers will sign Quentin Grimes to a long-term contract this offseason, according to multiple reports.

On Wednesday, Tony Jones of The Athletic reported Grimes had “two offers on the table”—his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer, and a “one-year balloon payment” which would require him to waive his implicit no-trade clause. Grimes’ agent, David Bauman, later told Gina Mizell of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Sixers had also offered Grimes a four-year, $39 million contract, which a Sixers source “strongly refuted” to Mizell.

League sources told Michael Scotto of HoopsHype that because of “the wide gap in evaluation,” it’s “highly unlikely” that Grimes and the Sixers will come to an agreement on a long-term deal. Scotto added that for Grimes to “waive his no-trade clause flexibility on any one-year deal, Philadelphia’s offer would preferably somewhere north of the non-taxpayer mid-level exception ($14 million) and $19 million range.” Otherwise, Grimes will “strongly consider” signing his qualifying offer “and retaining his no-trade clause flexibility.”

Grimes’ qualifying offer will automatically expire on Oct. 1, so he and the Sixers only have a few more days to hash out terms either on a one-year deal or a long-term contract. Both he and the Sixers should be motivated to avoid the qualifying offer at all costs, as it’s a lose-lose scenario for both sides.

Why Grimes Shouldn’t Want The Qualifying Offer

If Grimes does accept the qualifying offer, he’ll have the right to veto any trade involving him this season. That’s because he would lose his Bird rights if he does get traded, which could hamper his new team’s ability to re-sign him in free agency next summer.

When a team has Bird rights on a free agent, it can re-sign him to anything up to a maximum contract even if it’s over the salary cap. But if Grimes gets traded after accepting his qualifying offer, his new team will only have non-Bird rights on him. His new team therefore couldn’t offer him more than 120% of the value of his qualifying offer (roughly $10.4 million) as the starting salary of his next contract, unless it used a separate salary-cap exception (such as the non-taxpayer mid-level exception) on him.

Bauman told Mizell that he believed Grimes “should command $20-25 million annually” on his next contract. Unless his new team had enough cap space to re-sign him to a contract starting at that figure, he’d have to leave after one season to command that type of a payday. Any team interested in trading for him thus might not be willing to give up much since it could face realistic competition for him next summer without his Bird rights.

Maintaining the right to veto any trade would give Grimes full control over his future. If nothing else, he could refuse to accept any trade, stay in Philadelphia for the season and then test his luck as an unrestricted free agent next summer. The Sixers would still have his Bird rights at that point, which could give them an advantage in free agency.

But if Grimes is looking for a fresh start elsewhere, the qualifying offer might not be his best path out of Philadelphia.

Why The Sixers Shouldn’t Want The Qualifying Offer

If Grimes takes the qualifying offer, the Sixers will be roughly $1.1 million under the $195.9 million first apron with 14 players under standard contract. They’d also still have his Bird rights next summer if they didn’t trade him before then. That’s about where the good news ends, though.

Since Grimes’ Bird rights wouldn’t travel with him in a trade, that could tamp down overall trade interest in him. Even if they found a team that wanted to trade for him, his $8.7 million contract would limit how much salary they could receive in a deal.

If the Sixers cross the first apron at any point this season, they won’t be allowed to take back more salary than they send out in a trade. If they do take back more salary than they send out, they’ll be hard-capped at the first apron through June 30, 2026, which means they couldn’t cross that threshold under any circumstances.

The Sixers could package Kelly Oubre Jr. ($8.4 million) or Andre Drummond ($5.0 million) with Grimes to take back a larger contract, but they wouldn’t be able to receive someone in the $20-25 million range without swinging a 3-for-1 deal or trading one of Joel Embiid, Paul George or Tyrese Maxey. If they signed Grimes to a one-year balloon deal in the $15-20 million range, they’d give themselves far more trade flexibility, although they’d also push themselves well above the first apron and close to the $207.8 million second apron.

Even if they sign Grimes to a one-year balloon deal, he’d still lose his Bird rights if he agreed to a trade. However, his non-Bird rights would have more value if he’s on a larger contract, as his new team could offer him far more in free agency than it could on the qualifying offer.

Signing Grimes to a larger one-year contract would cost the Sixers more in luxury tax, although they’d still have a few months to cut down on their tax bill. Even if Grimes isn’t wiling to waive his implicit no-trade clause with such a deal, a larger contract should make him more appealing from a trade perspective than if he picks up the qualifying offer.

Both sides may still be posturing ahead of the Oct. 1 deadline, although there’s only a few days left for them to reach a resolution. Either way, the qualifying offer is a nuclear option that wouldn’t benefit Grimes or the Sixers. They both have incentive to avoid that at all costs.

Unless otherwise noted, all stats via NBA.com, PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook.

Follow Bryan on Bluesky.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2025/09/27/sixers-quentin-grimes-would-both-lose-if-he-accepts-87-million-qualifying-offer/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

The post Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. “If you can’t make money, you may want to consider being quiet. Maybe the market knows more than you do.” — Jeff Yass Today, The Breakdown looks at developing stories and links from around the cryptoverse. After Jeff Yass brought his math and poker skills onto trading floors in the 1980s, global options markets stopped looking like a casino and started looking like a science. Yass thinks prediction markets could do the same for the world. First and foremost, he says, “It will stop wars.” Yass cites the second Iraq War, which President Bush said would cost the US $20 billion but is now thought to have cost at least $2 trillion, and maybe as much as $6 trillion. It’s unlikely prediction markets would have settled on such an astronomical number, but Yass believes they might have predicted something like $500 billion, in which case “people might have said, ‘Look, we don’t want this war.’” That would have saved many, many lives, as well: “If people know how expensive it’s going to be and how disastrous it’s going to be, they’ll try to come up with other solutions.” Prediction markets, he says, “can really slow down the lies that politicians are constantly telling us.” He also cites applications in insurance, technology and even dating. Asked by the 16-year-old podcast host what advice he’d give young people, Yass suggested they could avoid relationship mistakes by creating an anonymous prediction market for their friends to bet on. “I believe in markets,” he concluded. It sounds like a dumb idea: Unlike stocks with their open-ended valuations, prediction markets should converge toward the single fixed probability of a binary outcome. But the author of No Dumb Ideas crunched the numbers and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/14 23:52
U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer

U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer

The post U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pictured here is Louis Vuitton’s new cruise ship-shaped store in Shanghai, China, on June 28, 2025. Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images BEIJING — China’s economic slowdown isn’t discouraging U.S. and European brands from revamping their strategies to reach Chinese shoppers. Instead, the allure of the world’s second-largest consumer market is forcing companies to adapt in the face of growing competition from local brands. In the case of Kraft Heinz, getting more people in China to buy ketchup this year also meant hiring a local agency to help create catchy campaigns — decorating subway station columns to mimic ketchup bottles and promoting the condiment as a fresh twist on a popular dish: stir-fried eggs and tomatoes. It’s a hard market to tackle, even for Shanghai-based marketing firm Good Idea Growth Network (GGN). The agency has witnessed at least five different waves of consumer trends in its 14-year history, founder Stephy Liu, said in Mandarin, translated by CNBC. “The gameplay keeps on changing.” But GGN has succeeded even after rejecting an acquisition offer from British advertising giant WPP, Liu said, noting that about half of her clients are foreign brands. While Kraft Heinz isn’t done with its China ketchup campaign yet, the company reported second-quarter net sales in emerging markets climbed by 4.2% from a year ago, helping offset declines in North America. WPP explored a potential acquisition of GGN but did not end up going far in the process, according to a person familiar with the discussions. Kraft Heinz did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Localized social media From Starbucks’ struggles to Lululemon’s successes in China, it’s become clear that the right mix of localization is essential. “Among international brands in China, the winners are often dedicating more than 40% of revenue to marketing, especially content and platform-first…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/04 09:22