The post Stanford Survey Reveals ‘Great Divide’ in Global AI Optimism appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new Stanford HAI survey reveals a “great divide” in AI optimism: 83% of Chinese respondents are optimistic, versus only 39% of Americans. Western nations (U.S., Canada, Netherlands) remain cautious, though sentiment has slowly improved (France/Germany +10%) since 2022. Vitalik Buterin noted this divergence mirrors other emerging sciences, like gene editing, where Asia also shows higher trust than the West. A new international survey from Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) Institute reveals a growing global divide in public sentiment toward AI. While interest in AI technologies continues to surge across Asia, Western countries show more restrained confidence in their benefits. A ‘Great Divide’: Asia Leads, West Lags in AI Optimism According to the findings, 83% of respondents in China view AI products and services as more beneficial than harmful. This represents the highest level of optimism globally. Similar sentiment is seen in Indonesia (80%) and Thailand (77%), where majorities express confidence in AI’s positive impact. AI Optimism — defined as seeing AI products & services as more beneficial than harmful — is at 83% in China but only 39% in the U.S. This is what those EA billionaires bought with their propaganda money. pic.twitter.com/l3I450og9a — David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 10, 2025 Western nations, by contrast, report lower levels of trust. Only 40% of Canadians, 39% of Americans, and 36% of Dutch respondents consider AI beneficial overall. Despite this caution, the report does show a slow improvement in sentiment. Positive attitudes have increased by 10 percentage points in Germany and France since 2022. Both Canada and Great Britain saw 8-point gains, while the United States recorded a 4-point gain, signaling a gradual shift in perception. Related: AI Crypto Sector Leads Market With NEAR, TAO, FIL, and Story Among Best Buys The accompanying Ipsos dataset from 2022 to 2024 displays these… The post Stanford Survey Reveals ‘Great Divide’ in Global AI Optimism appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new Stanford HAI survey reveals a “great divide” in AI optimism: 83% of Chinese respondents are optimistic, versus only 39% of Americans. Western nations (U.S., Canada, Netherlands) remain cautious, though sentiment has slowly improved (France/Germany +10%) since 2022. Vitalik Buterin noted this divergence mirrors other emerging sciences, like gene editing, where Asia also shows higher trust than the West. A new international survey from Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) Institute reveals a growing global divide in public sentiment toward AI. While interest in AI technologies continues to surge across Asia, Western countries show more restrained confidence in their benefits. A ‘Great Divide’: Asia Leads, West Lags in AI Optimism According to the findings, 83% of respondents in China view AI products and services as more beneficial than harmful. This represents the highest level of optimism globally. Similar sentiment is seen in Indonesia (80%) and Thailand (77%), where majorities express confidence in AI’s positive impact. AI Optimism — defined as seeing AI products & services as more beneficial than harmful — is at 83% in China but only 39% in the U.S. This is what those EA billionaires bought with their propaganda money. pic.twitter.com/l3I450og9a — David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 10, 2025 Western nations, by contrast, report lower levels of trust. Only 40% of Canadians, 39% of Americans, and 36% of Dutch respondents consider AI beneficial overall. Despite this caution, the report does show a slow improvement in sentiment. Positive attitudes have increased by 10 percentage points in Germany and France since 2022. Both Canada and Great Britain saw 8-point gains, while the United States recorded a 4-point gain, signaling a gradual shift in perception. Related: AI Crypto Sector Leads Market With NEAR, TAO, FIL, and Story Among Best Buys The accompanying Ipsos dataset from 2022 to 2024 displays these…

Stanford Survey Reveals ‘Great Divide’ in Global AI Optimism

2025/11/11 19:11
  • A new Stanford HAI survey reveals a “great divide” in AI optimism: 83% of Chinese respondents are optimistic, versus only 39% of Americans.
  • Western nations (U.S., Canada, Netherlands) remain cautious, though sentiment has slowly improved (France/Germany +10%) since 2022.
  • Vitalik Buterin noted this divergence mirrors other emerging sciences, like gene editing, where Asia also shows higher trust than the West.

A new international survey from Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) Institute reveals a growing global divide in public sentiment toward AI. While interest in AI technologies continues to surge across Asia, Western countries show more restrained confidence in their benefits.

A ‘Great Divide’: Asia Leads, West Lags in AI Optimism

According to the findings, 83% of respondents in China view AI products and services as more beneficial than harmful. This represents the highest level of optimism globally. Similar sentiment is seen in Indonesia (80%) and Thailand (77%), where majorities express confidence in AI’s positive impact.

Western nations, by contrast, report lower levels of trust. Only 40% of Canadians, 39% of Americans, and 36% of Dutch respondents consider AI beneficial overall.

Despite this caution, the report does show a slow improvement in sentiment. Positive attitudes have increased by 10 percentage points in Germany and France since 2022. Both Canada and Great Britain saw 8-point gains, while the United States recorded a 4-point gain, signaling a gradual shift in perception.

Related: AI Crypto Sector Leads Market With NEAR, TAO, FIL, and Story Among Best Buys

The accompanying Ipsos dataset from 2022 to 2024 displays these changes, showing a constant, region-specific rise in AI confidence as exposure to practical applications, including productivity tools, automation systems, and governance technologies, increases globally.

Buterin: Divergence Mirrors Other Emerging Sciences

Following the report’s release, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin noted this divergence is not unique to AI. He referenced a related global survey highlighting a similar pattern of public trust in other emerging sciences.

Citing Pew Research Center’s International Science Survey (2019–2020), Buterin pointed to views surrounding gene-editing research as an illustrative comparison. 

The Pew data shows approval for gene editing is highest in India (56%) and Taiwan (44%). Japan records the lowest regional belief at 26%.

In the Americas, Canadians (60%) and Americans (60%) align closely with Brazil (63%). European responses vary widely. France (75%) and Germany (68%) show high approval, while Italy and Poland display stronger ethical reservations.

Related: Vitalik Buterin’s Six-Month Roadmap for Ethereum: Faster, Fairer, and With AI

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/stanford-survey-global-divide-ai-optimism-asia-leads-usa-lags/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

The post Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. “If you can’t make money, you may want to consider being quiet. Maybe the market knows more than you do.” — Jeff Yass Today, The Breakdown looks at developing stories and links from around the cryptoverse. After Jeff Yass brought his math and poker skills onto trading floors in the 1980s, global options markets stopped looking like a casino and started looking like a science. Yass thinks prediction markets could do the same for the world. First and foremost, he says, “It will stop wars.” Yass cites the second Iraq War, which President Bush said would cost the US $20 billion but is now thought to have cost at least $2 trillion, and maybe as much as $6 trillion. It’s unlikely prediction markets would have settled on such an astronomical number, but Yass believes they might have predicted something like $500 billion, in which case “people might have said, ‘Look, we don’t want this war.’” That would have saved many, many lives, as well: “If people know how expensive it’s going to be and how disastrous it’s going to be, they’ll try to come up with other solutions.” Prediction markets, he says, “can really slow down the lies that politicians are constantly telling us.” He also cites applications in insurance, technology and even dating. Asked by the 16-year-old podcast host what advice he’d give young people, Yass suggested they could avoid relationship mistakes by creating an anonymous prediction market for their friends to bet on. “I believe in markets,” he concluded. It sounds like a dumb idea: Unlike stocks with their open-ended valuations, prediction markets should converge toward the single fixed probability of a binary outcome. But the author of No Dumb Ideas crunched the numbers and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/14 23:52
U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer

U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer

The post U.S., Europe brands take on the Chinese consumer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pictured here is Louis Vuitton’s new cruise ship-shaped store in Shanghai, China, on June 28, 2025. Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images BEIJING — China’s economic slowdown isn’t discouraging U.S. and European brands from revamping their strategies to reach Chinese shoppers. Instead, the allure of the world’s second-largest consumer market is forcing companies to adapt in the face of growing competition from local brands. In the case of Kraft Heinz, getting more people in China to buy ketchup this year also meant hiring a local agency to help create catchy campaigns — decorating subway station columns to mimic ketchup bottles and promoting the condiment as a fresh twist on a popular dish: stir-fried eggs and tomatoes. It’s a hard market to tackle, even for Shanghai-based marketing firm Good Idea Growth Network (GGN). The agency has witnessed at least five different waves of consumer trends in its 14-year history, founder Stephy Liu, said in Mandarin, translated by CNBC. “The gameplay keeps on changing.” But GGN has succeeded even after rejecting an acquisition offer from British advertising giant WPP, Liu said, noting that about half of her clients are foreign brands. While Kraft Heinz isn’t done with its China ketchup campaign yet, the company reported second-quarter net sales in emerging markets climbed by 4.2% from a year ago, helping offset declines in North America. WPP explored a potential acquisition of GGN but did not end up going far in the process, according to a person familiar with the discussions. Kraft Heinz did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Localized social media From Starbucks’ struggles to Lululemon’s successes in China, it’s become clear that the right mix of localization is essential. “Among international brands in China, the winners are often dedicating more than 40% of revenue to marketing, especially content and platform-first…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/04 09:22