TLDRs: Texas judge orders Apple and OpenAI to face Musk’s multi-billion AI lawsuit. XAI claims Apple’s AI integration stifles innovation and limits consumer choice. Apple says it plans to collaborate with multiple AI providers, denying exclusivity. AI startups and smartphone makers prepare for increased interoperability requirements. A federal court in Texas has moved forward with [...] The post Texas Court Advances XAI’s Multi-Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Apple and OpenAI appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs: Texas judge orders Apple and OpenAI to face Musk’s multi-billion AI lawsuit. XAI claims Apple’s AI integration stifles innovation and limits consumer choice. Apple says it plans to collaborate with multiple AI providers, denying exclusivity. AI startups and smartphone makers prepare for increased interoperability requirements. A federal court in Texas has moved forward with [...] The post Texas Court Advances XAI’s Multi-Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Apple and OpenAI appeared first on CoinCentral.

Texas Court Advances XAI’s Multi-Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Apple and OpenAI

2025/11/14 22:36

TLDRs:

  • Texas judge orders Apple and OpenAI to face Musk’s multi-billion AI lawsuit.
  • XAI claims Apple’s AI integration stifles innovation and limits consumer choice.
  • Apple says it plans to collaborate with multiple AI providers, denying exclusivity.
  • AI startups and smartphone makers prepare for increased interoperability requirements.

A federal court in Texas has moved forward with Elon Musk’s X Corp. and xAI lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, marking a major escalation in legal scrutiny of the artificial intelligence sector.

U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman rejected motions from Apple and OpenAI seeking to dismiss the case, ordering both companies to submit additional arguments. The decision allows the lawsuit, which seeks billions of dollars in damages, to proceed.

Judge Rejects Dismissal Request

Filed in the Northern District of Texas, the lawsuit accuses Apple and OpenAI of working in concert to limit competition in AI technology.

Judge Pittman’s ruling comes after both companies argued the case should be dismissed, citing lack of grounds. The court’s order now ensures that both Apple and OpenAI will have to address the allegations in court.

The lawsuit’s central contention is that Apple’s integration of OpenAI’s tools into the iPhone operating system restricts consumer choice while potentially stifling innovation in the broader AI market. X Corp. and xAI allege that these integrations create a competitive advantage for OpenAI at the expense of other AI developers.

Allegations of Restricted AI Competition

OpenAI has pushed back against the claims, suggesting in court filings that Musk’s lawsuit stems from personal disputes with the company’s CEO Sam Altman, who co-founded OpenAI alongside Musk.

Apple, meanwhile, maintains that its collaboration with OpenAI is not exclusive and insists that it plans to work with other AI providers in the future.

Legal experts note that the case could have significant implications for AI competition and interoperability. If Apple’s partnerships with AI companies are found to block rivals or raise switching costs for consumers, it could set a precedent for how technology partnerships are regulated.

Apple Denies Exclusive OpenAI Deal

Apple emphasized in its statements that it does not have an exclusive deal with OpenAI and intends to incorporate multiple AI providers in the iPhone ecosystem.

This strategy could counter claims of market foreclosure and support arguments that consumers still have choices among AI services.

However, regulators such as the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) have warned that bundling or limiting interoperability in AI markets can reduce rivalry, particularly in foundation models, general-purpose AI systems trained on broad datasets. Legal observers expect that the case may clarify whether mere partnerships between tech giants create antitrust risks or if plaintiffs must prove that competitors are effectively excluded.

Industry Braces for Multi-Model Support

The lawsuit comes amid growing regulatory scrutiny of AI platforms and smartphone ecosystems. Smartphone manufacturers and operating system developers face mounting pressure to support multiple AI models, as seen in the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition, and Consumers Act (DMCC).

Effective January 2025, the CMA has given Apple provisional Strategic Market Status over its mobile ecosystem, signaling increased expectations for user choice and interoperability.

Industry insiders suggest that AI developers and platform vendors should prepare interoperability tools and standardized APIs to ensure compliance. Orchestration layers that route requests across multiple AI providers, along with monitoring and compliance solutions, may become essential for mitigating legal and regulatory risks in the coming years.

The post Texas Court Advances XAI’s Multi-Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against Apple and OpenAI appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto

The post Prediction markets, DATs, the fee switch, and Project Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. “If you can’t make money, you may want to consider being quiet. Maybe the market knows more than you do.” — Jeff Yass Today, The Breakdown looks at developing stories and links from around the cryptoverse. After Jeff Yass brought his math and poker skills onto trading floors in the 1980s, global options markets stopped looking like a casino and started looking like a science. Yass thinks prediction markets could do the same for the world. First and foremost, he says, “It will stop wars.” Yass cites the second Iraq War, which President Bush said would cost the US $20 billion but is now thought to have cost at least $2 trillion, and maybe as much as $6 trillion. It’s unlikely prediction markets would have settled on such an astronomical number, but Yass believes they might have predicted something like $500 billion, in which case “people might have said, ‘Look, we don’t want this war.’” That would have saved many, many lives, as well: “If people know how expensive it’s going to be and how disastrous it’s going to be, they’ll try to come up with other solutions.” Prediction markets, he says, “can really slow down the lies that politicians are constantly telling us.” He also cites applications in insurance, technology and even dating. Asked by the 16-year-old podcast host what advice he’d give young people, Yass suggested they could avoid relationship mistakes by creating an anonymous prediction market for their friends to bet on. “I believe in markets,” he concluded. It sounds like a dumb idea: Unlike stocks with their open-ended valuations, prediction markets should converge toward the single fixed probability of a binary outcome. But the author of No Dumb Ideas crunched the numbers and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/14 23:52
Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

The post Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell talks to reporters following the regular Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Fed on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Federal Reserve is projecting only one rate cut in 2026, fewer than expected, according to its median projection. The central bank’s so-called dot plot, which shows 19 individual members’ expectations anonymously, indicated a median estimate of 3.4% for the federal funds rate at the end of 2026. That compares to a median estimate of 3.6% for the end of this year following two expected cuts on top of Wednesday’s reduction. A single quarter-point reduction next year is significantly more conservative than current market pricing. Traders are currently pricing in at two to three more rate cuts next year, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, updated shortly after the decision. The gauge uses prices on 30-day fed funds futures contracts to determine market-implied odds for rate moves. Here are the Fed’s latest targets from 19 FOMC members, both voters and nonvoters: Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards The forecasts, however, showed a large difference of opinion with two voting members seeing as many as four cuts. Three officials penciled in three rate reductions next year. “Next year’s dot plot is a mosaic of different perspectives and is an accurate reflection of a confusing economic outlook, muddied by labor supply shifts, data measurement concerns, and government policy upheaval and uncertainty,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management. The central bank has two policy meetings left for the year, one in October and one in December. Economic projections from the Fed saw slightly faster economic growth in 2026 than was projected in June, while the outlook for inflation was updated modestly higher for next year. There’s a lot of uncertainty…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:59